Literature DB >> 18461091

Challenges of exposure assessment for health studies in the aftermath of chemical incidents and disasters.

Sim Bongers1, Nicole A H Janssen, B Reiss, L Grievink, E Lebret, H Kromhout.   

Abstract

Exposure assessment during and after acute chemical incidents and disasters is essential for health studies that may follow. During chemical incidents, the focus usually lies on risk assessment and afterward attention shifts toward possible (long-term) health effects. This may lead to insufficient available data on exposure to study the association between exposure and health outcome, and collection of additional exposure data is often required. Literature on health studies conducted after several chemical incidents was reviewed to obtain better insight on the needs of health studies. Four different types of scenarios were distinguished based on when exposure data were collected and the exposure data used for health studies. These four scenarios gave insight on exposure data needed for conclusive health studies and when different methods of exposure data collection should be used. Literature indicated that adequate and rapid exposure assessment during chemical incidents is vital for health studies, because data that are not collected during or directly after an incident may be irretrievably lost. Poor exposure assessment is not always the only problem in health studies. Problems in health studies including poor exposure assessment may be prevented when the general design and needs of health studies are taken into account when designing contingency plans. Together with measures that will help facilitate funding, design, and coordination of health studies, disaster management programs should, among others, prepare for methods that lead to a swift identification of released substances, determination of concentrations and dispersion of released substances, designing basic questionnaire outlines, and rapid evaluation of the usefulness and necessity of employing biological sampling.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18461091     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2008.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  9 in total

1.  Spectrum of health condition in methyl isocyanate (MIC)-exposed survivors measured after 30 years of disaster.

Authors:  Bani Bandana Ganguly; Shouvik Mandal; Nitin N Kadam
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Preparedness and response to chemical and biological threats: the role of exposure science.

Authors:  Paul J Lioy; Jeffrey D Laskin; Panos G Georgopoulos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Associating Increased Chemical Exposure to Hurricane Harvey in a Longitudinal Panel Using Silicone Wristbands.

Authors:  Samantha M Samon; Diana Rohlman; Lane G Tidwell; Peter D Hoffman; Abiodun O Oluyomi; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Rapid Health and Needs assessments after disasters: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helena A Korteweg; Irene van Bokhoven; C J Yzermans; Linda Grievink
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Disasters and perinatal health:a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Harville; Xu Xiong; Pierre Buekens
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  The Health of Firefighters Deployed to the Fort McMurray Fire: Lessons Learnt.

Authors:  Nicola Cherry; Jeremy Beach; Jean-Michel Galarneau
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 7.  Epidemiologic methods lessons learned from environmental public health disasters: Chernobyl, the World Trade Center, Bhopal, and Graniteville, South Carolina.

Authors:  Erik R Svendsen; Jennifer R Runkle; Venkata Ramana Dhara; Shao Lin; Marina Naboka; Timothy A Mousseau; Charles Bennett
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Source reconstruction of airborne toxics based on acute health effects information.

Authors:  Christos D Argyropoulos; Samar Elkhalifa; Eleni Fthenou; George C Efthimiou; Spyros Andronopoulos; Alexandros Venetsanos; Ivan V Kovalets; Konstantinos E Kakosimos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Mass Casualty Decontamination for Chemical Incidents: Research Outcomes and Future Priorities.

Authors:  Samuel Collins; Thomas James; Holly Carter; Charles Symons; Felicity Southworth; Kerry Foxall; Tim Marczylo; Richard Amlôt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.