Literature DB >> 18460587

Impact of an inpatient anticoagulation management service on clinical outcomes.

Paula J Biscup-Horn1, Michael B Streiff, Timothy R Ulbrich, Todd W Nesbit, Kenneth M Shermock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic medications require careful management to avoid thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications. The benefits of specialized anticoagulation management services (AMS) in the outpatient setting are well established; less evidence of benefit in the hospital setting is available.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefits of an inpatient AMS to cardiac surgery patients requiring warfarin anticoagulation therapy.
METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective, single-center, cohort study of consecutive cardiac surgery patients treated before (January 2003-May 2005) and after (June-December 2005) establishment of an inpatient AMS. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as laboratory and clinical data were retrieved from institutional electronic databases and compared between the 2 patient cohorts. Comparisons between study groups were conducted using a chi(2) or Fisher's Exact test for categorical variables and a Student's t-test for continuous variables. Analysis of rare event data was conducted using Poisson regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of 1919 patients admitted during the study interval, 826 received warfarin (674 pre-AMS, 152 post-AMS). The number of patients with postsurgical panic international normalized ratio (INR) values declined after initiation of the AMS (pre-AMS 90/674 [13.4%] vs post-AMS 11/152 [7.2%]; p = 0.036). There was a trend toward fewer clinically significant postoperative bleeding events (pre-AMS 21/674 [3.1%] vs post-AMS 2/152 [1.3%]; p = 0.22) and fewer repeat surgeries for late postoperative bleeding (pre-AMS 8/674 [1.2%] vs post-AMS 0/152 [0%]; p = 0.08). AMS intervention was associated with a 17% decrease in the average postsurgical length of stay (13.9 days vs 11.6 days; p = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary AMS can improve anticoagulation management, leading to fewer panic INR values and a reduced length of hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18460587     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1L027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  10 in total

1.  Inpatient warfarin management: pharmacist management using a detailed dosing protocol.

Authors:  Nancy L Dawson; Ivan E Porter; Dusko Klipa; William R Bamlet; Mary Ann Hedges; Michael J Maniaci; Jason Persoff; Archana Roy; Alden V Patel
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Outcomes of warfarin therapy managed by pharmacists via hospital anticoagulation clinic versus online anticoagulation clinic.

Authors:  Hua Cao; Jianmei Wu; Jinhua Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-06-28

4.  The impact of pharmacy monitoring and intervention in patients receiving intravenous heparin.

Authors:  Michaela C Lysogorski; Amany K Hassan; Stacie J Lampkin; Richard Geisler
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-05-15

5.  Impact of a pharmacotherapeutic programme on control and safety of long-term anticoagulation treatment: a controlled follow-up study in Spain.

Authors:  Carmen Duran-Parrondo; Juan M Vazquez-Lago; Ana M Campos-Lopez; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  The Impact of Pharmacist-Managed Service on Warfarin Therapy in Patients after Mechanical Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Wu; Chien-Chih Wu; Chien-Hao Chen; Shin-Yi Lin; Ron-Bin Hsu; Chih-Fen Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.149

7.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

8.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and the impact of a thrombosis service at a Canadian level 1 trauma centre

Authors:  Paul T. Engels; Heather Thomas; Angela Coates; Husham Bakry; Abdulaziz Alali; Ahmad AlGhambdi; Ahmed Al-Jabri; Ahmed Bugshan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  A pre- post-evaluation of implementing an inpatient warfarin monitoring and education program.

Authors:  Edward P Armstrong; Lucy Chemodurow; Shanna Christensen; E Suzanne Johnson
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2011-06-17

Review 10.  Clinical impact of a pharmacist-led inpatient anticoagulation service: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tiffany Lee; Erin Davis; Jason Kielly
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2016-05-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.