Literature DB >> 18460561

Prognostic significance of the Ki-67 labeling index in growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas.

A Fusco1, M C Zatelli, A Bianchi, V Cimino, L Tilaro, F Veltri, F Angelini, L Lauriola, V Vellone, F Doglietto, M R Ambrosio, G Maira, A Giustina, E C degli Uberti, A Pontecorvi, L De Marinis.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Ki-67 is a marker of proliferation activity associated with invasiveness and prognosis in human tumors.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the Ki-67 index prognostic relevance in a group of acromegalic patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected 68 consecutive acromegalic patients referred to our hospital during a 5-yr period. The Ki-67 index was determined by immunohistochemistry on tissue samples obtained from each adenoma after surgery. Those patients who were not completely cured after surgery began medical therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). Periodical pituitary magnetic resonance imaging and hormonal evaluation were performed during the follow-up.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 68 patients were cured after surgery (41%). Among the 40 patients treated with SSAs, 13 were considered uncontrolled. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging showed residual/recurrent disease in 25 of 68 patients after 6 months. No correlation was found between Ki-67 index and age, tumor size, GH, or IGF-I plasma levels. Tumors described as having cavernous sinus invasion had a higher mean Ki-67 index as compared with noninvasive tumors (P < 0.01). The Ki-67 index was significantly lower in tumors in patients cured after surgery as compared with patients considered not cured (P < 0.01) and in tumors in patients controlled by SSA therapy as compared with patients considered as uncontrolled (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The Ki-67 labeling index may predict clinical outcome in postsurgical management of acromegalic patients. We suggest routine Ki-67 evaluation in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18460561     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-0126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  21 in total

1.  Determination of cell proliferation using Mcm2 antigen and evaluation of apoptosis and TGF-beta1 expression in GH-secreting or clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Cristina Micheletto Dallago; Ligia Maria Barbosa-Coutinho; Nelson Pires Ferreira; Rosalva Meurer; Julia Fernanda Semmelmann Pereira-Lima; Miriam da Costa Oliveira
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 2.  Update on prognostic factors in acromegaly: Is a risk score possible?

Authors:  E Fernandez-Rodriguez; F F Casanueva; I Bernabeu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Pituitary gland: Medical therapy for acromegaly: can we predict response?

Authors:  Andrea Giustina; Teresa Porcelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Optimal use of pegvisomant in acromegaly: are we getting there?

Authors:  Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Clinical implications of growth hormone-secreting tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades; Shibana Shafi; Janice M Kerr; Tzu L Phang; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Margaret E Wierman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Management of aggressive growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Daniel A Donoho; Namrata Bose; Gabriel Zada; John D Carmichael
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Clinical, biological, radiological, and pathological comparison of sparsely and densely granulated somatotroph adenomas: a single center experience from a cohort of 131 patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Amy A Swanson; Dana Erickson; Diane Mary Donegan; Sarah M Jenkins; Jamie J Van Gompel; John L D Atkinson; Bradley J Erickson; Caterina Giannini
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  The optimal numerosity of the referral population of pituitary tumors centers of excellence (PTCOE): A surgical perspective.

Authors:  Pietro Mortini; Gianluca Nocera; Francesca Roncelli; Marco Losa; Anna Maria Formenti; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Prognostic factor from MR spectroscopy in rat with astrocytic tumour during radiation therapy.

Authors:  T G Yu; Y Feng; X Y Feng; J Z Dai; H J Qian; Z Huang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Pituitary adenoma…nomen omen?

Authors:  Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.