OBJECTIVES: To investigate the importance of cost and awareness of health- or disease-promoting properties of foods and meals for choices by customers of a cafeteria. DESIGN: A non-randomized intervention study. SETTING: A medium size cafeteria in the Harvard School of Public Health. PARTICIPANTS: Customers of the cafeteria mainly consisting of public health students, faculty, and school staff and workers from the medical campus. INTERVENTION: The purchase of healthy foods and dishes was subsidized and their prices reduced by 20%. This promotion was accompanied by the distribution of educational material. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in consumption of healthy and less healthy foods. ANALYSIS: The geometric mean was used to calculate the change in consumption. RESULTS: During the intervention, we observed a 6% increase in the consumption of healthy foods (95% confidence interval [CI]; 5% to 8%), and a 2% decline in the consumption of less-healthy foods (95% CI; -1% to -4%). After the prices returned to their original levels, the consumption of healthy foods increased further to 17% (95% CI; 13% to 20%) and a 2% decline in the consumption of less-healthy foods (95% CI; % 1 to -5%) persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Subsidizing healthful meals and educating consumers about the importance of a healthy diet can result in a modest increase in the selection of healthy foods and meals that can be maintained beyond the periods of subsidy and promotion.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the importance of cost and awareness of health- or disease-promoting properties of foods and meals for choices by customers of a cafeteria. DESIGN: A non-randomized intervention study. SETTING: A medium size cafeteria in the Harvard School of Public Health. PARTICIPANTS: Customers of the cafeteria mainly consisting of public health students, faculty, and school staff and workers from the medical campus. INTERVENTION: The purchase of healthy foods and dishes was subsidized and their prices reduced by 20%. This promotion was accompanied by the distribution of educational material. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in consumption of healthy and less healthy foods. ANALYSIS: The geometric mean was used to calculate the change in consumption. RESULTS: During the intervention, we observed a 6% increase in the consumption of healthy foods (95% confidence interval [CI]; 5% to 8%), and a 2% decline in the consumption of less-healthy foods (95% CI; -1% to -4%). After the prices returned to their original levels, the consumption of healthy foods increased further to 17% (95% CI; 13% to 20%) and a 2% decline in the consumption of less-healthy foods (95% CI; % 1 to -5%) persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Subsidizing healthful meals and educating consumers about the importance of a healthy diet can result in a modest increase in the selection of healthy foods and meals that can be maintained beyond the periods of subsidy and promotion.
Authors: S A French; R W Jeffery; M Story; K K Breitlow; J S Baxter; P Hannan; M P Snyder Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer D Seymour; Amy Lazarus Yaroch; Mary Serdula; Heidi Michels Blanck; Laura Kettel Khan Journal: Prev Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Leonard H Epstein; Noelle Jankowiak; Chantal Nederkoorn; Hollie A Raynor; Simone A French; Eric Finkelstein Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Ashkan Afshin; Neal L Benowitz; Vera Bittner; Stephen R Daniels; Harold A Franch; David R Jacobs; William E Kraus; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Debra A Krummel; Barry M Popkin; Laurie P Whitsel; Neil A Zakai Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: María Kathia Cárdenas; Catherine P Benziger; Timesh D Pillay; J Jaime Miranda Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Nadine Budd; Alison Cuccia; Jayne K Jeffries; Divya Prasad; Kevin D Frick; Lisa Powell; Fred A Katz; Joel Gittelsohn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 3.295