Literature DB >> 18458865

Prevalence and prognostic impact of microembolic signals in arterial sources of embolism. A systematic review of the literature.

Martin A Ritter1, Ralf Dittrich, Niels Thoenissen, E Bernd Ringelstein, Darius G Nabavi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compile available studies using microembolic signal (MES) detection by transcranial Doppler sonography in varying sources of arterial brain embolism. We investigated prevalences of MES and whether MES detection is of proven use for risk stratification.
METHOD: Studies reporting prevalences of MES and the risk of cerebral ischemic events were pooled for patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis, intracranial artery stenosis, cervical artery dissection, and aortic embolism.
RESULTS: MES were reported in 43% of 586 patients with symptomatic and in 10% of 1066 patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Presence of one MES indicated an increased risk of future events [odds ratio (OR): 7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.6-15.4, p<0.0001 for symptomatic, and OR: 13.4, 95% CI: 6.5-27.4, p<0.0001 for asymptomatic disease). MES were reported in 25% of 220 patients with symptomatic vs. 0% of 86 patients with asymptomatic intracranial stenosis (p<0.0001), Of 82 patients with cervical artery dissection presenting with TIA or stroke, 50% had MES compared with 13% of 16 patients with local symptoms (p=0.006), In patients with aortic embolism, patients with plaques >or= 4 mm more frequently had MES compared with patients with smaller plaques (p=0.04), Data were insufficient to reliably predict future events in patients with intracranial stenosis, cervical artery dissection, and aortic embolism.
CONCLUSION: MES are a frequent finding in varying sources of arterial brain embolism, MES detection is useful for risk stratification in patients with carotid stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18458865     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-008-0638-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  43 in total

1.  Ambulatory transcranial Doppler cerebral embolic signal detection in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew D Mackinnon; Rune Aaslid; Hugh S Markus
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Detection of middle cerebral artery emboli during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  M P Spencer; G I Thomas; S C Nicholls; L R Sauvage
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Cerebral microembolism in symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  M Siebler; A Kleinschmidt; M Sitzer; H Steinmetz; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Prevalence and frequency of microembolic signals in 105 patients with extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease.

Authors:  D W Droste; R Dittrich; V Kemény; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; E B Ringelstein
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Embolic signals and prediction of ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anne L Abbott; Brian R Chambers; Jacinda L Stork; Christopher R Levi; Christopher F Bladin; Geoffrey A Donnan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Embolus detection in different degrees of carotid disease.

Authors:  B M Eicke; J von Lorentz; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.448

7.  Time period required for transcranial Doppler monitoring of embolic signals to predict recurrent risk of embolic transient ischemic attack and stroke from arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Till Blaser; Wenzel Glanz; Stephan Krueger; Claus-Werner Wallesch; Siegfried Kropf; Michael Goertler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  High-intensity transient signals in patients with cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  M Daffertshofer; S Ries; U Schminke; M Hennerici
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Quantification of ultrasound emboli signals in patients with cardiac and carotid disease.

Authors:  D G Grosset; D Georgiadis; A W Kelman; K R Lees
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Cerebral microembolism and the risk of ischemia in asymptomatic high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  M Siebler; A Nachtmann; M Sitzer; G Rose; A Kleinschmidt; J Rademacher; H Steinmetz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  16 in total

1.  Potential role of PMD-TCD monitoring in the management of hemodynamically unstable intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Paola Palazzo; Kristian Barlinn; Clotilde Balucani; Limin Zhao; Timothy W Prestley; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Prognostic impact of microembolic signals in arterial sources of embolism.

Authors:  Vijay K Sharma
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Vascular imaging in stroke: comparative analysis.

Authors:  Kristian Barlinn; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Neuropsychological impact of cerebral microemboli in ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S Kochhäuser; H H Lohmann; M A Ritter; P Leitz; F Güner; S Zellerhoff; C Korsukewitz; D G Dechering; J Banken; N M Peters; L Eckardt; G Mönnig
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  [Sonographic diagnostics in neurological emergency and intensive care medicine].

Authors:  J U Harrer; M Nedelmann; J Eyding; M Ritter; U Schminke; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; M Köhrmann; F Schlachetzki
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 6.  Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Konark Malhotra; Nitin Goyal; Georgios Tsivgoulis
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Simultaneous assessment of plaque morphology, cerebral micro-embolic signal status and platelet biomarkers in patients with recently symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Stephen J Murphy; Soon T Lim; Justin A Kinsella; Sean Tierney; Bridget Egan; Tim M Feeley; Clare Dooley; James Kelly; Sinead M Murphy; Richard A Walsh; Ronan Collins; Tara Coughlan; Desmond O'Neill; Joseph A Harbison; Prakash Madhavan; Sean M O'Neill; Mary P Colgan; Jim F Meaney; George Hamilton; Dominick Jh McCabe
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Microemboli-monitoring during the acute phase of ischemic stroke: is it worth the time?

Authors:  Titto T Idicula; Halvor Naess; Lars Thomassen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  A mechanistic investigation into non-infarcted brain injury induced by cerebral artery microemboli.

Authors:  Yiying Wu; Leisi Bian; Xiushi Ni; Min Ning; Yanling Zhao; Rujing Ling
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  Microemboli After Successful Thrombectomy Do Not Affect Outcome but Predict New Embolic Events.

Authors:  Faheem Sheriff; Mariana Diz-Lopes; Ayaz Khawaja; Farzaneh Sorond; Can Ozan Tan; Elsa Azevedo; Maria Angela Franceschini; Henri Vaitkevicius; Karen Li; Andrew Donald Monk; Sarah LaRose Michaud; Steven K Feske; Pedro Castro
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.