Literature DB >> 18458585

Long-term biomechanical stability and clinical improvement after extended multilevel corpectomy and circumferential reconstruction of the cervical spine using titanium mesh cages.

Frank L Acosta1, Henry E Aryan, Dean Chou, Christopher P Ames.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of clinical case series.
OBJECTIVE: We present our experience with extended (> or =3 levels) anterior cervical corpectomy (EACC) and reconstruction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Multilevel cervical corpectomy has traditionally been associated with increased graft-related complications and worse clinical outcomes compared with single-level procedures. Data specifically regarding corpectomies across 3 or more levels remains limited.
METHODS: Retrospective review of data on 20 patients who underwent anterior cervical corpectomies with titanium mesh cage reconstruction and supplemental posterolateral fixation across 3 or more levels of the cervical spine. Anteroposterior/lateral plain films were used to determine sagittal balance and cage subsidence. Fusion was defined as the lack of motion on flexion-extension radiographs. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative clinical assessment using visual analog scores and Nurick grading.
RESULTS: Surgery was performed for spondylotic myelopathy in 15 patients, osteomyelitis in 4, and fracture in 1. Corpectomies were performed across an average of 3.4 levels. Average follow-up was 33 months. Local autograft was used in all cases except osteomyelitis, where allograft was used instead. Sagittal balance was improved or maintained in all patients and was not related to number of corpectomy levels. An average of 30.2 degrees of kyphosis correction was achieved in 9 patients. All patients demonstrated radiographic evidence of fusion without significant cage subsidence and no cases of instrumentation failure. Improvement in pain and functional scores occurred in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential reconstruction using titanium mesh cages after EACC can provide appropriate, biomechanically stable fixation and allows for significant correction of preexisting kyphosis. Supplemental posterior instrumentation may limit delayed cage subsidence and loss of sagittal balance after this procedure. EACC and circumferential reconstruction seems to be an effective treatment for symptomatic degenerative, traumatic, or infectious pathology involving 3 or more levels of the anterior cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18458585     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180654205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  19 in total

1.  The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Juliane Zenner; Stefan Midderhoff; Stefan Middendorf; Nicolaus Graf; Nicolaus Gräf; H Resch; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hans-Joachim Willke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Lian; Jian-Guang Xu; Bing-Fang Zeng; Wei Zhou; Wei-Qing Kong; Tie-Sheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Werner Schmoelz; Juliane Zenner; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl; Davud Malekzadeh; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Martina Blocher; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Comparison of anterior-only versus combined anterior and posterior fusion for unstable subaxial cervical injuries: a meta-analysis of biomechanical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Dong-Yeong Lee; Young-Jin Park; Myung-Geun Song; Kun-Tae Kim; Dong-Hee Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Retrospective analysis of cervical corpectomies: implant-related complications of one- and two-level corpectomies in 45 patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Hartmann; P Kavakebi; C Wipplinger; A Tschugg; P P Girod; S Lener; C Thomé
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Radiological studies on the best entry point and trajectory of anterior cervical pedicle screw in the lower cervical spine.

Authors:  Liujun Zhao; Guoqing Li; Jiayong Liu; Gregory M Benedict; Nabil A Ebraheim; Weihu Ma; Shaohua Sun; Rongming Xu; Chaoyue Ruan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Evaluation of a new type of titanium mesh cage versus the traditional titanium mesh cage for single-level, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Yu Fengbin; Miao Jinhao; Liao Xinyuan; Wang Xinwei; Chen Yu; Chen Deyu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cervical Spine Under-Represents Sagittal Plane Deformity in Degenerative Myelopathy Patients.

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; Arunit J Chugh; Jeremy J Gebhart; Jason D Eubanks
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-07

9.  Anterior surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: review article.

Authors:  John C Quinn; Paul D Kiely; Darren R Lebl; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-08-08

10.  In vitro study of accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using an electronic conductivity device (ATPS part III).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Wolfgang Hitzl; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Juliane Zenner; Herbert Resch; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Oliver Meier; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.