Literature DB >> 18456146

Torque expression of self-ligating brackets.

Hisham M Badawi1, Roger W Toogood, Jason P R Carey, Giseon Heo, Paul W Major.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The labiolingual inclination of maxillary and mandibular incisors is considered by many orthodontists to be an important determinant of pleasing dental esthetics and ideal stable occlusion. In contemporary fixed appliances, attaching a rectangular orthodontic archwire to a bracket with a rectangular slot makes third-order control possible. The purpose of this study was to measure the difference in third-order moments that can be delivered by engaging 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel archwires to 2 active self-ligating brackets (In-Ovation, GAC, Bohemia, NY; Speed, Strite Industries, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada) and 2 passive self-ligating brackets (Damon2, Ormco, Orange, Calif; Smart Clip, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif).
METHODS: A bracket/wire assembly torsion device was developed. This novel apparatus can apply torsion to the wire while maintaining perfect vertical and horizontal alignment between the wire and the bracket. A multi-axis force/torque transducer was used to measure the moment of the couple (torque), and a digital inclinometer was used to measure the torsion angle. Fifty maxillary right central incisor brackets from each of the 4 manufacturers were tested.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the engagement angle between the 2 types of brackets; on average, torque started to be expressed at 7.5 degrees of torsion for the active self-ligating brackets and at 15 degrees of torsion for the passive self-ligating brackets. The torque expression was higher for the active self-ligating brackets up to 35 degrees of torsion. Torsion of the wire past this point resulted in a linear increase of the measured torque for the Damon2, the Smart Clip, and the In-Ovation brackets. The torque was relatively constant past 35 degrees of torsion for the Speed bracket.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that active self-ligating brackets are more effective in torque expression than passive self-ligating brackets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18456146     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  28 in total

1.  Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets : A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Isil Aras; Idil Unal; Gencer Huniler; Aynur Aras
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Measurement of orthodontic bracket tie wing elastic and plastic deformation by arch wire torque expression utilizing an optical image correlation technique.

Authors:  Ryan A Lacoursiere; David S Nobes; Darren L N Homeniuk; Jason P Carey; Hisham H Badawi; Paul W Major
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2009-12-13

3.  Orthodontic Bracket Manufacturing Tolerances and Dimensional Differences between Select Self-Ligating Brackets.

Authors:  Thomas W Major; Jason P Carey; David S Nobes; Paul W Major
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2010-06-27

4.  How orthodontic records can influence torque choice decisions?

Authors:  Dimitrios Mavreas; Enya Kuppens; Ronald Buyl; Bart Vande Vannet
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The leveling effectiveness of self-ligating and conventional brackets for complex tooth malalignments.

Authors:  Magali Fansa; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Active and passive self-ligation: a myth? Part 1: torque control.

Authors:  Lorenz Martin Brauchli; Markus Steineck; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 7.  Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Archambault; Ryan Lacoursiere; Hisham Badawi; Paul W Major; Jason Carey; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Amy Archambault; Thomas W Major; Jason P Carey; Giseon Heo; Hisham Badawi; Paul W Major
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Comparative analysis of slot dimension in lingual bracket systems.

Authors:  Anton Demling; Marc P Dittmer; Rainer Schwestka-Polly
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Ferdinand M Machibya; Xingfu Bao; Lihua Zhao; Min Hu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.