STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Matching a natural maxillary central incisor to a metal ceramic crown is one of the most difficult challenges in clinical dentistry due to the limitations of dental shade guides and the subjectivity of perceptual evaluation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of a spectrophotometric shade-matching system on tooth color reproduction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two metal ceramic crowns were fabricated for a maxillary central incisor for 36 patients using 2 shade-matching techniques. The first technique was conventional visual matching using 3 shade guide systems, and the second was an instrument-based color-matching technique using a new spectrophotometric system. Color difference (DeltaE) values between the contralateral natural tooth and each of the 2 crowns were calculated in the cervical, middle, and incisal regions. The DeltaE values were compared using a Student's t test (alpha=.05). Three calibrated examiners evaluated the color match by ranking it from 1 to 10 (10 = perfect match; 1 = no match; < or =8, accepted; > or =7, rejected). McNemar's test was used to calculate the odds ratio of accepting restorations fabricated using a spectrophotometric system to conventional methods. RESULTS: Results revealed that the mean DeltaE values of crowns matched with the spectrophotometer were significantly lower than those using a conventional technique (P<.001). The odds ratio of 12.5 was calculated, indicating that conventionally matched crowns were more likely to be rejected than those matched using the spectrophotometer (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical study, crowns fabricated using a dedicated spectrophotometer had a significantly better color match and a lower rate of rejection due to shade mismatch compared to crowns fabricated with a conventional shade-matching method.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Matching a natural maxillary central incisor to a metal ceramic crown is one of the most difficult challenges in clinical dentistry due to the limitations of dental shade guides and the subjectivity of perceptual evaluation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of a spectrophotometric shade-matching system on tooth color reproduction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two metal ceramic crowns were fabricated for a maxillary central incisor for 36 patients using 2 shade-matching techniques. The first technique was conventional visual matching using 3 shade guide systems, and the second was an instrument-based color-matching technique using a new spectrophotometric system. Color difference (DeltaE) values between the contralateral natural tooth and each of the 2 crowns were calculated in the cervical, middle, and incisal regions. The DeltaE values were compared using a Student's t test (alpha=.05). Three calibrated examiners evaluated the color match by ranking it from 1 to 10 (10 = perfect match; 1 = no match; < or =8, accepted; > or =7, rejected). McNemar's test was used to calculate the odds ratio of accepting restorations fabricated using a spectrophotometric system to conventional methods. RESULTS: Results revealed that the mean DeltaE values of crowns matched with the spectrophotometer were significantly lower than those using a conventional technique (P<.001). The odds ratio of 12.5 was calculated, indicating that conventionally matched crowns were more likely to be rejected than those matched using the spectrophotometer (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical study, crowns fabricated using a dedicated spectrophotometer had a significantly better color match and a lower rate of rejection due to shade mismatch compared to crowns fabricated with a conventional shade-matching method.