Literature DB >> 18454449

A meta-analysis of nonsense mutations causing human genetic disease.

Matthew Mort1, Dobril Ivanov, David N Cooper, Nadia A Chuzhanova.   

Abstract

Nonsense mutations account for approximately 11% of all described gene lesions causing human inherited disease and approximately 20% of disease-associated single-basepair substitutions affecting gene coding regions. Pathological nonsense mutations resulting in TGA (38.5%), TAG (40.4%), and TAA (21.1%) occur in different proportions to naturally occurring stop codons. Of the 23 different nucleotide substitutions giving rise to nonsense mutations, the most frequent are CGA --> TGA (21%; resulting from methylation-mediated deamination) and CAG --> TAG (19%). The differing nonsense mutation frequencies are largely explicable in terms of variable nucleotide substitution rates such that it is unnecessary to invoke differential translational termination efficiency or differential codon usage. Some genes are characterized by numerous nonsense mutations but relatively few if any missense mutations (e.g., CHM) whereas other genes exhibit many missense mutations but few if any nonsense mutations (e.g., PSEN1). Genes in the latter category have a tendency to encode proteins characterized by multimer formation. Consistent with the operation of a clinical selection bias, genes exhibiting an excess of nonsense mutations are also likely to display an excess of frameshift mutations. Tumor suppressor (TS) genes exhibit a disproportionate number of nonsense mutations while most mutations in oncogenes are missense. A total of 12% of somatic nonsense mutations in TS genes were found to occur recurrently in the hypermutable CpG dinucleotide. In a comparison of somatic and germline mutational spectra for 17 TS genes, approximately 43% of somatic nonsense mutations had counterparts in the germline (rising to 98% for CpG mutations). Finally, the proportion of disease-causing nonsense mutations predicted to elicit nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is significantly higher (P=1.56 x 10(-9)) than among nonobserved (potential) nonsense mutations, implying that nonsense mutations that elicit NMD are more likely to come to clinical attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18454449     DOI: 10.1002/humu.20763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  151 in total

1.  Gene inactivation and its implications for annotation in the era of personal genomics.

Authors:  Suganthi Balasubramanian; Lukas Habegger; Adam Frankish; Daniel G MacArthur; Rachel Harte; Chris Tyler-Smith; Jennifer Harrow; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Nonsense-mediated RNA decay regulation by cellular stress: implications for tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Lawrence B Gardner
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 5.852

3.  Translational readthrough of GLA nonsense mutations suggests dominant-negative effects exerted by the interaction of wild-type and missense variants.

Authors:  Silvia Lombardi; Mattia Ferrarese; Saverio Marchi; Paolo Pinton; Mirko Pinotti; Francesco Bernardi; Alessio Branchini
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 4.  Toward a Kinetic Understanding of Eukaryotic Translation.

Authors:  Masaaki Sokabe; Christopher S Fraser
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  The low frequency of recessive disease: insights from ENU mutagenesis, severity of disease phenotype, GWAS associations, and demography: an analytical review.

Authors:  Robert P Erickson; N Avrion Mitchison
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  On the sequence-directed nature of human gene mutation: the role of genomic architecture and the local DNA sequence environment in mediating gene mutations underlying human inherited disease.

Authors:  David N Cooper; Albino Bacolla; Claude Férec; Karen M Vasquez; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; Jian-Min Chen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 7.  Therapeutics based on stop codon readthrough.

Authors:  Kim M Keeling; Xiaojiao Xue; Gwen Gunn; David M Bedwell
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 8.  Nonsense-mediated decay in genetic disease: friend or foe?

Authors:  Jake N Miller; David A Pearce
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 9.  Allelic imbalance and haploinsufficiency in MYBPC3-linked hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Amelia A Glazier; Andrea Thompson; Sharlene M Day
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.657

10.  An integrated approach to the interpretation of single amino acid polymorphisms within the framework of CATH and Gene3D.

Authors:  Jose M G Izarzugaza; Anja Baresic; Lisa E M McMillan; Corin Yeats; Andrew B Clegg; Christine A Orengo; Andrew C R Martin; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.