BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: M1 muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs) represent an attractive drug target for the treatment of cognitive deficits associated with diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. However, the discovery of subtype-selective mAChR agonists has been hampered by the high degree of conservation of the orthosteric ACh-binding site among mAChR subtypes. The advent of functional screening assays has enabled the identification of agonists such as AC-42 (4-n-butyl-1-[4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl]-piperidine), which bind to an allosteric site and selectively activate the M(1) mAChR subtype. However, studies with this compound have been limited to recombinantly expressed mAChRs. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, we have compared the pharmacological profile of AC-42 and a close structural analogue, 77-LH-28-1 (1-[3-(4-butyl-1-piperidinyl)propyl]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone) at human recombinant, and rat native, mAChRs by calcium mobilization, inositol phosphate accumulation and both in vitro and in vivo electrophysiology. KEY RESULTS: Calcium mobilization and inositol phosphate accumulation assays revealed that both AC-42 and 77-LH-28-1 display high selectivity to activate the M1 mAChR over other mAChR subtypes. Furthermore, 77-LH-28-1, but not AC-42, acted as an agonist at rat hippocampal M1 receptors, as demonstrated by its ability to increase cell firing and initiate gamma frequency network oscillations. Finally, 77-LH-28-1 stimulated cell firing in the rat hippocampus in vivo following subcutaneous administration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data suggest that 77-LH-28-1 is a potent, selective, bioavailable and brain-penetrant agonist at the M1 mAChR and therefore that it represents a better tool than AC-42, with which to study the pharmacology of the M1 mAChR.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: M1 muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs) represent an attractive drug target for the treatment of cognitive deficits associated with diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. However, the discovery of subtype-selective mAChR agonists has been hampered by the high degree of conservation of the orthosteric ACh-binding site among mAChR subtypes. The advent of functional screening assays has enabled the identification of agonists such as AC-42 (4-n-butyl-1-[4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl]-piperidine), which bind to an allosteric site and selectively activate the M(1) mAChR subtype. However, studies with this compound have been limited to recombinantly expressed mAChRs. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, we have compared the pharmacological profile of AC-42 and a close structural analogue, 77-LH-28-1 (1-[3-(4-butyl-1-piperidinyl)propyl]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone) at human recombinant, and rat native, mAChRs by calcium mobilization, inositol phosphate accumulation and both in vitro and in vivo electrophysiology. KEY RESULTS:Calcium mobilization and inositol phosphate accumulation assays revealed that both AC-42 and 77-LH-28-1 display high selectivity to activate the M1 mAChR over other mAChR subtypes. Furthermore, 77-LH-28-1, but not AC-42, acted as an agonist at rat hippocampal M1 receptors, as demonstrated by its ability to increase cell firing and initiate gamma frequency network oscillations. Finally, 77-LH-28-1 stimulated cell firing in the rat hippocampus in vivo following subcutaneous administration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data suggest that 77-LH-28-1 is a potent, selective, bioavailable and brain-penetrant agonist at the M1 mAChR and therefore that it represents a better tool than AC-42, with which to study the pharmacology of the M1 mAChR.
Authors: N C Bodick; W W Offen; A I Levey; N R Cutler; S G Gauthier; A Satlin; H E Shannon; G D Tollefson; K Rasmussen; F P Bymaster; D J Hurley; W Z Potter; S M Paul Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1997-04
Authors: S E Hamilton; M D Loose; M Qi; A I Levey; B Hille; G S McKnight; R L Idzerda; N M Nathanson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-11-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M S Shapiro; M D Loose; S E Hamilton; N M Nathanson; J Gomeza; J Wess; B Hille Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-09-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Evan P Lebois; Gregory J Digby; Douglas J Sheffler; Bruce J Melancon; James C Tarr; Hyekyung P Cho; Nicole R Miller; Ryan Morrison; Thomas M Bridges; Zixiu Xiang; J Scott Daniels; Michael R Wood; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Evan P Lebois; Thomas M Bridges; L Michelle Lewis; Eric S Dawson; Alexander S Kane; Zixiu Xiang; Satyawan B Jadhav; Huiyong Yin; J Phillip Kennedy; Jens Meiler; Colleen M Niswender; Carrie K Jones; P Jeffrey Conn; C David Weaver; Craig W Lindsley Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2010 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Thomas M Bridges; Evan P LeBois; Corey R Hopkins; Michael R Wood; Carrie K Jones; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley Journal: Drug News Perspect Date: 2010-05
Authors: Gregory J Digby; Meredith J Noetzel; Michael Bubser; Thomas J Utley; Adam G Walker; Nellie E Byun; Evan P Lebois; Zixiu Xiang; Douglas J Sheffler; Hyekyung P Cho; Albert A Davis; Natali E Nemirovsky; Sarah E Mennenga; Bryan W Camp; Heather A Bimonte-Nelson; Jacob Bode; Kimberly Italiano; Ryan Morrison; J Scott Daniels; Colleen M Niswender; M Foster Olive; Craig W Lindsley; Carrie K Jones; P Jeffrey Conn Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Gregory J Digby; Thomas J Utley; Atin Lamsal; Christian Sevel; Douglas J Sheffler; Evan P Lebois; Thomas M Bridges; Michael R Wood; Colleen M Niswender; Craig W Lindsley; P Jeffrey Conn Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2012-09-09 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Morgane Thomsen; Jürgen Wess; Brian S Fulton; Anders Fink-Jensen; S Barak Caine Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 4.530