Literature DB >> 18453973

Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction.

Raj M Vyas1, Brian P Dickinson, Jaco H Fastekjian, James P Watson, Andrew L DaLio, Christopher A Crisera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lower abdomen is the most popular donor site for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Several studies have reported abdominal morbidity following pedicled and free flap reconstructions using this donor site, yet few studies have compared the various types of free flaps and investigated specific operative and patient-related factors that are associated with higher rates of abdominal complications.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of all free flap breast reconstructions performed at University of California Los Angeles Medical Center between July of 2002 and July of 2005.
RESULTS: A total of 279 patients underwent 211 unilateral and 68 bilateral reconstructions, totaling 347 flaps. Eleven percent were free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps, 52 percent were muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps, and 37 percent were deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Mean follow-up was 29.9 months. There were 30 total abdominal complications (10.9 percent of patients), including 17 rectus bulges and five hernias. Free TRAM reconstructions had a significantly higher rate of donor-site complications than did DIEP reconstructions. Bilateral flap harvests and obesity (body mass index >30) were significant risk factors for (1) any donor-site complication and (2) rectus bulge/hernia formation. There was no significant increase in donor-site complications associated with various prior abdominal operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Donor-site complications are not uncommon, but paying careful attention to patient comorbidities when selecting an operative approach (bilateral versus unilateral, free TRAM versus DIEP, and so on) can minimize postoperative abdominal complications. Furthermore, the results corroborate the recent literature suggesting there is little functional difference in patients receiving muscle-sparing free TRAM versus DIEP reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18453973     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816b1458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

1.  Violation of the rectus complex is not a contraindication to component separation for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Patrick B Garvey; Chad M Bailey; Donald P Baumann; Jun Liu; Charles E Butler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.

Authors:  Sheina A Macadam; Toni Zhong; Katie Weichman; Michael Papsdorf; Peter A Lennox; Alexes Hazen; Evan Matros; Joseph Disa; Babak Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The Impact of Obesity on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Nikhil Sobti; Aadit Patel; Evan Matros; Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph H Dayan; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Robert J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Free Tissue Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rami Dibbs; Jeff Trost; Valerie DeGregorio; Shayan Izaddoost
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hatan Mortada; Taif Fawaz AlNojaidi; Razan AlRabah; Yousif Almohammadi; Raghad AlKhashan; Hattan Aljaaly
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.269

6.  Breast Reconstruction Completion in the Obese: Does Reconstruction Technique Make a Difference in Its Achievement?

Authors:  Christine Velazquez; Robert C Siska; Ivo A Pestana
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.873

7.  Unilateral and Bilateral Breast Reconstruction with Pedicled TRAM Flaps: An Outcomes Analysis of 188 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Jordan E Ireton; Jon A Kluft; Jeffrey A Ascherman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-06-07

Review 8.  Is obesity a predisposing factor for free flap failure and complications? Comparison between breast and nonbreast reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin; Si-Gyun Roh; Nae-Ho Lee; Kyung-Moo Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The Type of Breast Reconstruction May Not Influence Patient Satisfaction in the Chinese Population: A Single Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Benlong Yang; Lin Li; Wenhui Yan; Jiaying Chen; Ying Chen; Zhen Hu; Guangyu Liu; Zhenzhou Shen; Zhimin Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Internal Mammary Vessels' Impact on Abdominal Skin Perfusion in Free Abdominal Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Solveig Nergård; James B Mercer; Louis de Weerd
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.