OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impact of the specialized medical and ancillary services available at low vs. high volume prostatectomy centers on prolonged length of stay (LOS) outcomes after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients who underwent prostatectomy (n = 9,266) for prostate cancer in 2003 using ICD-9 codes. Hospital characteristics were ascertained using the American Hospital Association file. Differences in health services availability according to hospital prostatectomy volume were estimated using logistic regression. Logistic models were fitted to measure the effect of available health services on a prolonged LOS (>90 percentile for sample was 5 days). RESULTS: Among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in 2003, 19.0% and 5.4% of patients had a prolonged LOS at low and high volume hospitals, respectively (unadjusted OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.5-6.9). After adjusting for differences in patients and availability of select health services, those treated at low volume centers were 3.3 times more likely to have a prolonged hospitalization compared with those treated at high volume hospitals (95% CI 1.9-5.6). Adjusting for hospital differences attenuated the volume effect by 14.8%. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial differences in the health care environment according to radical prostatectomy volume. Generally, high volume hospitals offer a much wider array of health care services specific to both post-prostatectomy and general medical care.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impact of the specialized medical and ancillary services available at low vs. high volume prostatectomy centers on prolonged length of stay (LOS) outcomes after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients who underwent prostatectomy (n = 9,266) for prostate cancer in 2003 using ICD-9 codes. Hospital characteristics were ascertained using the American Hospital Association file. Differences in health services availability according to hospital prostatectomy volume were estimated using logistic regression. Logistic models were fitted to measure the effect of available health services on a prolonged LOS (>90 percentile for sample was 5 days). RESULTS: Among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in 2003, 19.0% and 5.4% of patients had a prolonged LOS at low and high volume hospitals, respectively (unadjusted OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.5-6.9). After adjusting for differences in patients and availability of select health services, those treated at low volume centers were 3.3 times more likely to have a prolonged hospitalization compared with those treated at high volume hospitals (95% CI 1.9-5.6). Adjusting for hospital differences attenuated the volume effect by 14.8%. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial differences in the health care environment according to radical prostatectomy volume. Generally, high volume hospitals offer a much wider array of health care services specific to both post-prostatectomy and general medical care.
Authors: Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Charles D Scales; Christopher S Saigal; Janet M Hanley; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Mark S Litwin Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Christian Meyer; Shyam Sukumar; Akshay Sood; Julian Hanske; Malte Vetterlein; Jack S Elder; Margit Fisch; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Ariella A Friedman Journal: Korean J Urol Date: 2015-07-24