Literature DB >> 18449041

Fusion rates after thoracoscopic release and bone graft substitutes in idiopathic scoliosis.

Brett Weinzapfel1, Jochen P Son-Hing, Douglas G Armstrong, Laurel C Blakemore, Connie Poe-Kochert, George H Thompson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective assessment of fusion rates using either morselized allograft bone or demineralized bone matrix (DBM) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in idiopathic scoliosis.
OBJECTIVE: To compare fusion rates between allograft bone and demineralized bone matrix (Grafton DBM Flex) following VATS using on standard standing lateral spine radiographs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both VATS and bone graft substitutes are accepted surgical techniques. However, their concomitant use in spinal deformity surgery has not been previously reported. Bone graft substitute has the advantage of decreasing operative time, blood loss, and donor site morbidity associated with autografts.
METHODS: Anterior thoracic discectomies were performed using VATS. Forty patients with 1 year or more follow-up were evaluated-12 with morselized allograft bone (Allograft group) and 28 with folded Grafton DBM Flex (DBM group). Factors analyzed included age, number of anterior levels fused, operative time, anterior perioperative blood loss, curve correction, and fusion rates. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed before surgery and at month, 1 year, and at most recent follow-up. Interbody fusion was assessed on standing lateral radiographs using the Newton et al 4-level grading scale.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age at surgery, number of anterior vertebral levels fused, anterior operative time per level, anterior intraoperative blood loss, chest tube drainage and duration, or total perioperative anterior blood loss between the 2 groups. Percent curve correction from before surgery to the most recent follow-up were very similar in both Allograft (68%) and DBM groups (67%). At most recent assessment, 60 of 73 disc spaces (82%) in the Allograft group and 100 of 109 disc spaces (92%) in the DBM group were rated as radiographically fused (Newton et al Grade I and II). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.088). No patients were observed to have crankshaft, pseudoarthrosis or hardware failure. There were no complications related to the bone graft material used.
CONCLUSION: Demineralized bone matrix (Grafton DBM Flex) seem to be an effective bone graft substitute in thoracoscopic surgery for idiopathic scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18449041     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f69b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 3.  A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Ryan Cassilly; Winifred Cantor; Emmanuel Edusei; Qusai Hammouri; Thomas Errico
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ki-Eun Chang; Mohamed Kamal Mesregah; Zoe Fresquez; Eloise W Stanton; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  [Simultaneous thoracoscopically assisted anterior release in prone position and posterior scoliosis correction : What are the limits?].

Authors:  H Böhm; H El Ghait; M Shousha
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Athanasios Ververidis; Sotirios Christodoulou; Konstantinos Kazakos; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

7.  Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Ian Rodway; Julie Gander
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 8.  Bone Graft Options for Spine Fusion in Adolescent Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Xi-Ming Xu; Gong Zhang; Fei Wang; Xian-Zhao Wei; Ming Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  J van der Stok; K A Hartholt; D A L Schoenmakers; J J C Arts
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.