Literature DB >> 18448981

A prospective study evaluating incision placement and wound healing for tibial plafond fractures.

James L Howard1, Julie Agel, David P Barei, Stephen K Benirschke, Sean E Nork.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the soft tissue complications after fixation of tibial plafond fractures to test the validity of the recommendation that a 7-cm skin bridge represents the minimum safe distance between surgical incisions.
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort.
SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS: A total 42 patients with 46 tibial plafond fractures. INTERVENTION: All injuries had a minimum of 2 surgical approaches for operative management of the tibial plafond and associated fibula fracture (if applicable). Two low-energy injuries had single-stage open reduction internal fixation of the tibia and fibula, and the remaining high- energy fractures had a 2-staged approach to management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The surgical approaches used, length of the incisions, distance between the incisions, and overlap between the incisions were recorded. Wound healing was assessed in the outpatient clinic over a 3-month period.
RESULTS: Two surgical approaches were used in 32 fractures, and 3 approaches were used in 14 fractures. The mean width of the skin bridge was 5.9 cm. The majority of the skin bridges were 5.0 to 5.9 cm (n = 25) or 6.0 to 6.9 cm (n = 16). Only 17% of the skin bridges were greater than 7.0 cm. Soft tissue complications occurred in 4 (9%) of 46 fractures. Healing of 2 anterolateral incisions was complicated by eschars that ultimately resolved with local wound care. One posterolateral fibular incision failed to heal until the fibular plate was removed. One patient required subsequent surgical procedures for infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a measured skin bridge of less than 7 cm in 83% of instances, the soft tissue complication rate was low in this group of tibial plafond fractures. With careful attention to soft tissue management and surgical timing, incisions for tibial plafond fractures may be placed less than 7 cm apart, allowing the surgeon to optimize exposures on the basis of injury pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18448981     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318172c811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  19 in total

1.  Does Early versus Delayed Spanning External Fixation Impact Complication Rates for High-energy Tibial Plateau and Plafond Fractures?

Authors:  Justin M Haller; David Holt; David L Rothberg; Erik N Kubiak; Thomas F Higgins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Risk factors of deep infection in operatively treated pilon fractures (AO/OTA: 43).

Authors:  Cesar S Molina; Daniel J Stinner; Andrew R Fras; Jason M Evans
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-21

3.  Staged treatment of pilon fractures.

Authors:  Chenthuran Deivaraju; Richard Vlasak; Kalia Sadasivan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-27

Review 4.  [Pilon fractures. Part 1: Diagnostics, treatment strategies and approaches].

Authors:  C Krettek; S Bachmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  High-energy tibial pilon fractures: an instructional review.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle; Khang H Dang; Samuel S Ornell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Plate fixation versus percutaneous rush pinning for osteosynthesis of the fibula in pilon fractures. A retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  F Poutoglidou; D Metaxiotis; A V Vasiliadis; A Mpeletsiotis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.522

Review 7.  Evolution in Management of Tibial Pilon Fractures.

Authors:  Jessica Bear; Natalie Rollick; David Helfet
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-12

8.  [Pilon fractures-considerations for treatment strategies and surgical approaches].

Authors:  P F Stillhard; H Frima; C Sommer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  [Modified staging strategy in treatment of type C3 Pilon fractures].

Authors:  Yu Chen; Hui Zhang; Xi Liu; Yaxing Li; Boquan Qin; Yi Ren; Shizhou Wu; Fuguo Huang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-11-15

10.  Clinical and radiological outcome of Gustilo type III open distal tibial and tibial shaft fractures after staged treatment with posterolateral minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique.

Authors:  Xiaojian He; Chuanzhen Hu; Kaihua Zhou; Qilin Zhai; Weifeng Wen; Fugen Pan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.