Literature DB >> 18448895

The impact of increasing medical school class size on clinical clerkships: a national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors.

Paul A Hemmer1, Tod Ibrahim, Steven J Durning.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of increasing medical school class size on the internal medicine clerkship.
METHOD: In 2006, the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine surveyed its 110 institutional members to discover whether their medical school class size had increased (or would increase) and the impact of increasing class size on number of students per teaching site, number of clerkship sites needed, and resources needed. Respondents rated their agreement or disagreement with statements about increasing class size, and they provided free-text responses. Analyses included descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis.
RESULTS: Response rate was 76% (83/110). In the three years preceding the survey, one medical school decreased class size; 43% increased by a mean of 14 students per year (10%). Most respondents (51%) expected class size to increase by a mean of 17 students per year (12%) through 2009; none expected class size to decrease. Increasing class size by 15% would mean adding 3.7 (standard deviation = 2.2) students per inpatient site, 2.9 (2.9) new inpatient sites, 3.0 (2.2) students per ambulatory site, and 4.9 (5.5) ambulatory sites. Respondents disagreed with the questionnaire statements that they would have more resources, teachers, and protected time; they agreed with statements that recruiting teachers would be harder as class size increases. Free-text responses to the challenges of increasing class size revealed two themes: strain on resources (space, time, faculty), and the impact on the educational experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine clerkship directors believe increasing medical school class size will dramatically increase resources needed during clerkships and may adversely impact education.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18448895     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816bde59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  A National Survey of Undergraduate Clinical Education in Internal Medicine.

Authors:  Amber T Pincavage; Mark J Fagan; Nora Y Osman; Debra S Leizman; Deborah DeWaay; Camilla Curren; Nadia Ismail; Karen Szauter; Michael Kisielewski; Amy W Shaheen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Improving efficiency of clinical skills training: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Martin G Tolsgaard; Sebastian Bjørck; Maria B Rasmussen; Amandus Gustafsson; Charlotte Ringsted
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A survey study on student preferences regarding pathology teaching in Germany: a call for curricular modernization.

Authors:  Florian E M Herrmann; Markus Lenski; Julius Steffen; Magdalena Kailuweit; Marc Nikolaus; Rajasekaran Koteeswaran; Andreas Sailer; Anna Hanszke; Maximilian Wintergerst; Sissi Dittmer; Doris Mayr; Orsolya Genzel-Boroviczény; Diann S Eley; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Medical students and controversial ethical issues: results from the multicenter study SBRAME.

Authors:  Giancarlo Lucchetti; Leandro Romani de Oliveira; José Roberto Leite; Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Using standardized patient encounters to teach longitudinal continuity of care in a family medicine clerkship.

Authors:  Bonnie M Vest; Abigail Lynch; Denise McGuigan; Timothy Servoss; Karen Zinnerstrom; Andrew B Symons
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study.

Authors:  Laerke Marijke Noerholk; Anne Mette Morcke; Kulamakan Kulasegaram; Lone N Nørgaard; Lotte Harmsen; Lisbeth Anita Andreasen; Nina Gros Pedersen; Vilma Johnsson; Anishan Vamadevan; Martin Grønnebaek Tolsgaard
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 7.647

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.