Yung-Nien Chen1, Suvobrata Mitra, Friederike Schlaghecken. 1. Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 123, Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Song, Kaohsiung County, Taiwan. ynchen@cgmh.org.tw
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The N-back task is frequently used in working memory studies. N-parameters allow experimental psychologists to analyze the sub-processes of N-back tasks in addition to general processing. However, previous imaging studies have not closely scrutinized these sub-processes. In the current study, three sub-processes in the N-back task were proposed using a logical task analysis: matching, replacement and shift. Domain-specific lateralization in spatial and verbal working memory was investigated in terms of this model. METHODS: This model was tested with two ERP experiments during N-back tasks, one conceptual (top-down) and one data-driven (bottom-up). RESULTS: Domain-specific lateralization was observed as predicted in the shift sub-process of the conceptual task and in the replacement sub-process of the data-driven task. Match-specific lateralization was also found. CONCLUSIONS: The results support our three-sub-process model of the N-back task and our hypothesis that replacement is a data-driven process with a posterior locus whereas shift is a more conceptual process with a more frontal locus. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed model correctly predicted ERP patterns in conceptual and data-driven N-back tasks and is potentially useful in understanding the neurophysiologic basis of N-back task performance. The similarity between match- and domain-specific lateralization in N-back tasks raised several issues for further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: The N-back task is frequently used in working memory studies. N-parameters allow experimental psychologists to analyze the sub-processes of N-back tasks in addition to general processing. However, previous imaging studies have not closely scrutinized these sub-processes. In the current study, three sub-processes in the N-back task were proposed using a logical task analysis: matching, replacement and shift. Domain-specific lateralization in spatial and verbal working memory was investigated in terms of this model. METHODS: This model was tested with two ERP experiments during N-back tasks, one conceptual (top-down) and one data-driven (bottom-up). RESULTS: Domain-specific lateralization was observed as predicted in the shift sub-process of the conceptual task and in the replacement sub-process of the data-driven task. Match-specific lateralization was also found. CONCLUSIONS: The results support our three-sub-process model of the N-back task and our hypothesis that replacement is a data-driven process with a posterior locus whereas shift is a more conceptual process with a more frontal locus. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed model correctly predicted ERP patterns in conceptual and data-driven N-back tasks and is potentially useful in understanding the neurophysiologic basis of N-back task performance. The similarity between match- and domain-specific lateralization in N-back tasks raised several issues for further investigation.
Authors: Natalie Nardone; Marian Shahid; Andrew A Strasser; Delia A Dempsey; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Mina Mirjalili; Reza Zomorrodi; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Sean L Hill; Sanjeev Kumar; Daniel M Blumberger; Corinne E Fischer; Alastair J Flint; Nathan Herrmann; Krista L Lanctôt; Linda Mah; Benoit H Mulsant; Bruce G Pollock; Tarek K Rajji Journal: Geroscience Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Matthew B Pontifex; Andrew C Parks; Patrick C O'Neil; Adriel R Egner; Joseph T Warning; Karin A Pfeiffer; Kimberly M Fenn Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.526
Authors: Nayantara Santhi; John A Groeger; Simon N Archer; Marina Gimenez; Luc J M Schlangen; Derk-Jan Dijk Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 3.240