Literature DB >> 18448369

Can rate of recovery be predicted in patients with acute low back pain? Development of a clinical prediction rule.

Mark J Hancock1, Christopher G Maher, Jane Latimer, Rob D Herbert, James H McAuley.   

Abstract

Some patients with low back pain recover quickly while others continue to experience pain beyond 3 months. The primary aim of this study was to develop a simple prediction rule to help clinicians identify patients with acute low back pain likely to recover at different rates. The secondary aim was to compare a clinician's prognosis judgement to the prediction rule. The study sample included 239 patients with acute low back pain who participated in a randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome was days to recovery from pain. Potential prognostic factors were initially tested for univariate association with recovery using Cox regression (p<0.1). Continuous prognostic factors with a significant association were dichotomised using a median split. Significantly associated prognostic factors were then included in a multivariate forward stepwise Cox regression. We then separated participants into strata according to the number of predictors in the final model for which they were positive. Our results suggest that a clinical prediction rule using three simple prognostic factors was able to differentiate between patients who recover quickly and those who recover slowly. Patients with lower than average initial pain intensity, shorter duration of symptoms and fewer previous episodes recovered more quickly (HR=3.5, 95% CI, 1.8-7.0) than patients without these characteristics. Therapists were able to predict patients likely to recover at different rates, (HR=1.6, 95% CI, 1.2-2.1), however, they did not perform as well as the clinical prediction rule. The rule requires validation in a different sample of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18448369     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  25 in total

Review 1.  Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-18

2.  Accuracy of physical therapists' prognosis of low back pain from the clinical examination: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Emma-Marie Kingan
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

3.  Can we predict response to the McKenzie method in patients with acute low back pain? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Charles Sheets; Luciana A C Machado; Mark Hancock; Chris Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  How little pain and disability do patients with low back pain have to experience to feel that they have recovered?

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Mark J Hancock; Julia M Hush; Robert J Smeets
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Association between history and physical examination factors and change in lumbar multifidus muscle thickness after spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Shane L Koppenhaver; Julie M Fritz; Jeffrey J Hebert; Greg N Kawchuk; Eric C Parent; Norman W Gill; John D Childs; Deydre S Teyhen
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mark J Hancock; Christopher G Maher; Jane Latimer
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

7.  PACE--the first placebo controlled trial of paracetamol for acute low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Williams; Jane Latimer; Christopher G Maher; Andrew J McLachlan; Chris W Cooper; Mark J Hancock; Richard O Day; James H McAuley; Chung-Wei Christine Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Preliminary study into the components of the fear-avoidance model of LBP: change after an initial chiropractic visit and influence on outcome.

Authors:  Jonathan R Field; Dave Newell; Peter W McCarthy
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-07-30

9.  A randomized, controlled trial of osteopathic manipulative treatment for acute low back pain in active duty military personnel.

Authors:  des Anges Cruser; Douglas Maurer; Kendi Hensel; Sarah K Brown; Kathryn White; Scott T Stoll
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-02

10.  "When will I recover?" A national survey on patients' and physicians' expectations concerning the recovery time for acute back pain.

Authors:  Serge Perrot; F A Allaert; V Concas; F Laroche
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.