Literature DB >> 18443972

Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition.

Pilar Andrés1, Chiara Guerrini, Louise H Phillips, Timothy J Perfect.   

Abstract

One of the major accounts of cognitive aging states that age effects are related to a deficiency of inhibitory mechanisms (Hasher & Zacks, 1988). Given that inhibition has traditionally been associated with the frontal cortex, and that the frontal cortex deteriorates early with age (Raz, 2000), this is consistent with the frontal hypothesis of aging (West, 1996). However, not all inhibitory processes require executive control, and so they are not all equally supported by the frontal cortex. As a consequence, one would expect dissociations between inhibitory tasks in the sense of a greater susceptibility of executive/frontal inhibition to aging. Based on Nigg's (2000) working inhibition taxonomy, we tested this hypothesis by combining inhibitory paradigms with different levels of executive control within the same participants. The results showed that age affects Stroop interference but not negative priming (Experiment 1) and stop signal responsiveness but not negative priming (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that tasks with a high executive (or effortful) inhibitory control are more sensitive to aging than tasks with a lower executive (more automatic) inhibitory control. The results are discussed in relation to the inhibitory and frontal accounts of aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443972     DOI: 10.1080/87565640701884212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1532-6942            Impact factor:   2.253


  44 in total

1.  When age is irrelevant: distractor inhibition and target activation in priming of pop-out.

Authors:  Marta Wnuczko; Jay Pratt; Lynn Hasher; Rob Walker
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Prosaccade errors in the antisaccade task: differences between corrected and uncorrected errors and links to neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Alison C Bowling; Emily A Hindman; James F Donnelly
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Patterns of cortical degeneration in an elderly cohort with cerebral small vessel disease.

Authors:  Andrew T Reid; Anouk G W van Norden; Karlijn F de Laat; Lucas J B van Oudheusden; Marcel P Zwiers; Alan C Evans; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Rolf Kötter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effects of age and cognitive load on response reprogramming.

Authors:  Yana Korotkevich; Kevin M Trewartha; Virginia B Penhune; Karen Z H Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number-space associations.

Authors:  Danielle Hoffmann; Delia Pigat; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-19

7.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

8.  Separating automatic and intentional inhibitory mechanisms of attention in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Walter Roberts; Mark T Fillmore; Richard Milich
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-02

9.  Online Attention Training for Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Wennberg; Alexandra Kueider; Adam Spira; Gregory Adams; Robert Rager; George Rebok
Journal:  Int J Cogn Technol       Date:  2014

10.  Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Miriam Gade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.