OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer is now standard in the Western world; however, only 30-40% of the patients respond to induction therapy. Pretherapeutic predictors of response and prognosis would be of utmost interest to individualize treatment. Glutathione-S-transferase enzymes detoxify therapeutic drugs such as platin derivates and may influence outcome of the treated patients. Therefore, glutathione-S-transferase (GST) polymorphisms were assessed as predictive markers in cisplatinum-based neoadjuvant-treated gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA was isolated from 139 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT3/4 anyN cM0) before chemotherapy. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction was used for GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes, and allelic discrimination assay with the TaqMan system for the GSTP1 gene. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients could be analyzed for GSTT1 (T-:23; T+87), 112 for GSTM1 (M-:52; M+:60) and 132 for GSTP1 (Ile/Ile: 55; Ile/Val: 59; Val/Val: 18). There was no significant correlation between any of the GSTT1, GSTM1, or GSTP1 genotypes and patients' characteristics or histopathological data; only the GSTM1+ genotype was associated with the non-intestinal subtype of the Lauren classification (p=0.045). GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 genotypes were not correlated with response to chemotherapy (p=0.57, p=0.38, p=0.33). In R0 resected patients, we found an improved survival for patients with the GSTM1-present genotype compared to patients with the GSTM1-null genotype (p=0.017). Moreover, the GSTM1-present genotype showed a significantly better tumor-related (p=0.017) and disease-free survival (p=0.029). CONCLUSION: None of the common GST polymorphisms predicts response in our study, but the GSTM1+ genotype was associated with a better prognosis in completely resected patients. Further investigations on chemotherapy-associated gene polymorphisms are warranted.
OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer is now standard in the Western world; however, only 30-40% of the patients respond to induction therapy. Pretherapeutic predictors of response and prognosis would be of utmost interest to individualize treatment. Glutathione-S-transferase enzymes detoxify therapeutic drugs such as platin derivates and may influence outcome of the treated patients. Therefore, glutathione-S-transferase (GST) polymorphisms were assessed as predictive markers in cisplatinum-based neoadjuvant-treated gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA was isolated from 139 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT3/4 anyN cM0) before chemotherapy. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction was used for GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes, and allelic discrimination assay with the TaqMan system for the GSTP1 gene. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients could be analyzed for GSTT1 (T-:23; T+87), 112 for GSTM1 (M-:52; M+:60) and 132 for GSTP1 (Ile/Ile: 55; Ile/Val: 59; Val/Val: 18). There was no significant correlation between any of the GSTT1, GSTM1, or GSTP1 genotypes and patients' characteristics or histopathological data; only the GSTM1+ genotype was associated with the non-intestinal subtype of the Lauren classification (p=0.045). GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 genotypes were not correlated with response to chemotherapy (p=0.57, p=0.38, p=0.33). In R0 resected patients, we found an improved survival for patients with the GSTM1-present genotype compared to patients with the GSTM1-null genotype (p=0.017). Moreover, the GSTM1-present genotype showed a significantly better tumor-related (p=0.017) and disease-free survival (p=0.029). CONCLUSION: None of the common GST polymorphisms predicts response in our study, but the GSTM1+ genotype was associated with a better prognosis in completely resected patients. Further investigations on chemotherapy-associated gene polymorphisms are warranted.
Authors: S M Davies; L L Robison; J D Buckley; T Tjoa; W G Woods; G A Radloff; J A Ross; J P Perentesis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C Sweeney; G Y McClure; M Y Fares; A Stone; B F Coles; P A Thompson; S Korourian; L F Hutchins; F F Kadlubar; C B Ambrosone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C B Ambrosone; C Sweeney; B F Coles; P A Thompson; G Y McClure; S Korourian; M Y Fares; A Stone; F F Kadlubar; L F Hutchins Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701