T Pepersack1. 1. Service de Gériatrie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium. tpepersa@ulb.ac.be
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health services for the elderly are becoming increasingly important in industrialized nations, and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is one of the procedures designed to improve the health of this sector of the population. In 2003 a survey among Belgian geriatricians showed that despite the interest of the geriatric teams for comprehensive geriatric assessment, it was not used enough. Considering these results, as a first step, screening tools were proposed for the main geriatric domains (Minimum Geriatric Screening Tools, MGST). OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of a MGST within the teams of geriatric units and to evaluate the efficacy of a MGST on the detection rate of the geriatric problems of admitted subjects. DESIGN: Prospective observational survey. METHODS: The teams were first asked to encode active geriatric problems suspected according to their conventional assessment. Then, in a second phase, a complete MGST was completed by the same team within the first week after admission. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty six registrations from 33 centres were available. Mean (+/- SD) number of screened geriatric problems was 1.5 +/- 1.2 without MGST and 4.7 +/- 1.7 (p < 0.0001) using the MGST. Except for the assessment for the risk of falls, the MGST leads to a better screening for the seven other main geriatric domains (functional, continence, cognition, depression, nutrition, pain, social). CONCLUSIONS: An improvement associated with the use of simple minimal geriatric tools to screen geriatric problems was evident. This approach has additional value for education and quality assurance.
BACKGROUND: Health services for the elderly are becoming increasingly important in industrialized nations, and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is one of the procedures designed to improve the health of this sector of the population. In 2003 a survey among Belgian geriatricians showed that despite the interest of the geriatric teams for comprehensive geriatric assessment, it was not used enough. Considering these results, as a first step, screening tools were proposed for the main geriatric domains (Minimum Geriatric Screening Tools, MGST). OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of a MGST within the teams of geriatric units and to evaluate the efficacy of a MGST on the detection rate of the geriatric problems of admitted subjects. DESIGN: Prospective observational survey. METHODS: The teams were first asked to encode active geriatric problems suspected according to their conventional assessment. Then, in a second phase, a complete MGST was completed by the same team within the first week after admission. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty six registrations from 33 centres were available. Mean (+/- SD) number of screened geriatric problems was 1.5 +/- 1.2 without MGST and 4.7 +/- 1.7 (p < 0.0001) using the MGST. Except for the assessment for the risk of falls, the MGST leads to a better screening for the seven other main geriatric domains (functional, continence, cognition, depression, nutrition, pain, social). CONCLUSIONS: An improvement associated with the use of simple minimal geriatric tools to screen geriatric problems was evident. This approach has additional value for education and quality assurance.
Authors: A M Epstein; J A Hall; M Fretwell; M Feldstein; M L DeCiantis; J Tognetti; C Cutler; M Constantine; R Besdine; J Rowe Journal: JAMA Date: 1990-01-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: P Mäntyselkä; E Kumpusalo; R Ahonen; A Kumpusalo; J Kauhanen; H Viinamäki; P Halonen; J Takala Journal: Pain Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: N I H Wellens; M Deschodt; J Flamaing; P Moons; S Boonen; X Boman; C Gosset; J Petermans; K Milisen Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Anupam Chandra; Sarah J Crane; Ericka E Tung; Gregory J Hanson; Frederick North; Stephen S Cha; Paul Y Takahashi Journal: Aging Dis Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 6.745
Authors: R M J Warnier; E van Rossum; E van Velthuijsen; W J Mulder; J M G A Schols; G I J M Kempen Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Cornelius Dzien; Petra Unterberger; Paul Hofmarcher; Hannes Winner; Monika Lechleitner Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 4.070