Literature DB >> 18443277

Revision surgery for failed elbow medial collateral ligament reconstruction.

Joshua S Dines1, Lewis A Yocum, Joshua B Frank, Neal S ElAttrache, Ralph A Gambardella, Frank W Jobe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although excellent results can be achieved in up to 90% of primary elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions, retears of the ligament have been reported. As the number of primary reconstructions continues to increase, one could expect a commensurate increase in the number of revision medial collateral ligament reconstructions performed. HYPOTHESIS: Given the difficulty associated with revision procedures, the complication rate relative to primary reconstructions would increase while the percentage of athletes returning to their previous level of play would decrease. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence. 4.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 15 patients who underwent revision surgery for retear of a reconstructed elbow medial collateral ligament. All patients had undergone previous elbow medial collateral ligament reconstruction and had new history and physical examination findings consistent with medial collateral ligament injury. Twelve subjects were professional baseball players and 3 were college-level players at the time of their revision procedure. Patients were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery. Outcomes were classified using the Conway scale.
RESULTS: Average time to revision was 36 months. The technique used in the revision was the Jobe technique in 11 cases, DANE TJ in 3, and primary repair in 1. Thirty-three percent (5/15 excellent) returned to their previous level of play for at least 1 season. Additionally, there were 4 good, 2 fair, and 4 poor results. The ligament repair had a good outcome. Forty percent (6/15) of patients had complications, 1 of whom required a subsequent surgery (lysis of adhesions). One subject experienced a retear of the medial collateral ligament.
CONCLUSION: The rate of return to play after revision medial collateral ligament surgery is much lower than after primary reconstruction. As was expected, the complication rate of revision surgery is higher as well. This study should help physicians when counseling baseball players who suffer retears of their medial collateral ligament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443277     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508314796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  21 in total

1.  Does posteromedial chondromalacia reduce rate of return to play after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Daryl C Osbahr; Joshua S Dines; Andrew J Rosenbaum; Joseph T Nguyen; David W Altchek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries in athletes: Can we improve our outcomes?

Authors:  Lauren H Redler; Ryan M Degen; Lucas S McDonald; David W Altchek; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18

Review 3.  Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in major league baseball players: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Bernard R Bach; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-18

Review 4.  Biomechanical testing of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  B M Saltzman; B J Erickson; J M Frank; J D Harris; G P Nicholson; B R Bach; N N Verma; A A Romeo
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 5.  Imaging of the post-operative medial elbow in the overhead thrower: common and abnormal findings after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction and ulnar nerve transposition.

Authors:  Steven P Daniels; Douglas N Mintz; Yoshimi Endo; Joshua S Dines; Darryl B Sneag
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  State of the Union on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in 2020: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Cort D Lawton; Joseph D Lamplot; Joshua I Wright-Chisem; Evan W James; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

7.  Does well maintained graft provide consistent return to play after medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow joint in elite baseball players?

Authors:  Jin-Young Park; Kyung-Soo Oh; Seung-Chul Bahng; Seok-Won Chung; Jin-Ho Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-05-16

8.  Anatomic Study of the Medial Collateral Ligament in Thai Population: A Cadaveric Study of 56 Elbows.

Authors:  Pamok Saengsirinavin; Rosarin Ratanalekha; Jaruwat Wechasil; Thanawan Jongthanakamol; Chaivat Sriratanavudhi; Woraphon Jaroenporn
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 9.  Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomy, Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Joshua D Harris; Peter N Chalmers; Bernard R Bach; Nikhil N Verma; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 10.  Optimal management of ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hibberd; J Rodney Brown; Joseph T Hoffer
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.