BACKGROUND: Using a genetic predisposition score (GPS), additively integrating the associations of 11 polymorphisms with coronary heart disease (CHD), we examined the consequences of the joint presence of a high GPS and nongenetic CHD risk factors. METHODS: Within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition, 202 case patients with medically confirmed incident coronary infarct and 197 control subjects were identified in Greece. Each polymorphism contributed 1 unit (high-risk homozygous), one-half unit (heterozygous), or no units (low-risk homozygous) to the GPS. Odds ratios of coronary infarction for those at high risk because of genetic predisposition and simultaneous presence of an established CHD risk factor were estimated, compared with subjects at low risk, for both GPS and each CHD risk factor. RESULTS: The joint presence of a high GPS (> or =3.5) and each studied CHD risk factor was in all instances associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary infarction. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 2.62 (1.14-6.02) for ever smoking, 2.88 (1.33-6.24) for hypertension, 3.50 (1.67-7.33) for low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level, 3.05 (1.53-6.08) for high non-HDL level, and 3.66 (1.75-7.65) for poor adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The odds ratios were always lower and nonsignificant when the GPS was low. There was suggestive evidence for interaction of a high GPS with hypertension (P = .05) and non-HDL cholesterol level (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic predisposition may interact with hypertension and, perhaps, also with the level of non-HDL cholesterol, in the causation of CHD. Genetic predisposition and the other studied exposures seem to have converging effects. Thus, the GPS may identify individuals who could realize disproportional benefits by controlling their hypertension and, possibly, their non-HDL cholesterol level.
BACKGROUND: Using a genetic predisposition score (GPS), additively integrating the associations of 11 polymorphisms with coronary heart disease (CHD), we examined the consequences of the joint presence of a high GPS and nongenetic CHD risk factors. METHODS: Within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition, 202 case patients with medically confirmed incident coronary infarct and 197 control subjects were identified in Greece. Each polymorphism contributed 1 unit (high-risk homozygous), one-half unit (heterozygous), or no units (low-risk homozygous) to the GPS. Odds ratios of coronary infarction for those at high risk because of genetic predisposition and simultaneous presence of an established CHD risk factor were estimated, compared with subjects at low risk, for both GPS and each CHD risk factor. RESULTS: The joint presence of a high GPS (> or =3.5) and each studied CHD risk factor was in all instances associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary infarction. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 2.62 (1.14-6.02) for ever smoking, 2.88 (1.33-6.24) for hypertension, 3.50 (1.67-7.33) for low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level, 3.05 (1.53-6.08) for high non-HDL level, and 3.66 (1.75-7.65) for poor adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The odds ratios were always lower and nonsignificant when the GPS was low. There was suggestive evidence for interaction of a high GPS with hypertension (P = .05) and non-HDL cholesterol level (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic predisposition may interact with hypertension and, perhaps, also with the level of non-HDL cholesterol, in the causation of CHD. Genetic predisposition and the other studied exposures seem to have converging effects. Thus, the GPS may identify individuals who could realize disproportional benefits by controlling their hypertension and, possibly, their non-HDL cholesterol level.
Authors: Mariska Klerk; Petra Verhoef; Robert Clarke; Henk J Blom; Frans J Kok; Evert G Schouten Journal: JAMA Date: 2002 Oct 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Golareh Agha; Joanne M Murabito; John W Lynch; Michal Abrahamowicz; Sam B Harper; Eric B Loucks Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-09-10 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: George Thanassoulis; Gina M Peloso; Michael J Pencina; Udo Hoffmann; Caroline S Fox; L Adrienne Cupples; Daniel Levy; Ralph B D'Agostino; Shih-Jen Hwang; Christopher J O'Donnell Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2012-01-10
Authors: Pablo Perez-Martinez; Dolores Corella; Jian Shen; Donna K Arnett; Nikos Yiannakouris; E Syong Tai; Marju Orho-Melander; Katherine L Tucker; Michael Tsai; Robert J Straka; Michael Province; Chew Suok Kai; Francisco Perez-Jimenez; Chao-Qiang Lai; Jose Lopez-Miranda; Marisa Guillen; Laurence D Parnell; Ingrid Borecki; Sekar Kathiresan; Jose M Ordovas Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Christopher Labos; Sara C Martinez; Rui Hao Leo Wang; Petra A Lenzini; Louise Pilote; Peter Bogaty; James M Brophy; James C Engert; Sharon Cresci; George Thanassoulis Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: M Junyent; K L Tucker; J Shen; Y-C Lee; C E Smith; J Mattei; C-Q Lai; L D Parnell; J M Ordovas Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 4.222