Literature DB >> 18441416

Technical note: comparing coherent and incoherent scatter effects for cone-beam CT.

Yiannis Kyriakou1, Michael Meyer, Willi A Kalender.   

Abstract

The intensity and distribution of scatter is of growing interest in the case of flat-detector CT (FD-CT) scanners. It is generally assumed that scatter is an offset distribution dominated by incoherent scatter (Compton effect). Coherent and incoherent scatter were computed with respect to acquisition parameters used in FD-CT. A hybrid method optimized the performance of the scatter simulation: a fast and exact analytical calculation of the single-scatter intensity combined with a coarse Monte Carlo (MC) estimate of multiple scatter to reduce overall computational expenses, while assuring an acceptable signal quality. The simulation package allowed for the separation of both coherent and incoherent single scatter. For cylindrical water phantoms varying from 40 mm to 320 mm diameter and for various z-collimations an investigation of the ratio of single-to-total scatter was performed. The intensity distribution of scatter (including coherent single scatter, incoherent single scatter and total scatter) was computed for phantoms of 160 mm and 320 mm diameter and energies varying from 40 keV to 120 keV. Additionally, voxel phantoms were generated from clinical head and thorax CT datasets and were employed in scatter simulations to demonstrate the effect of coherent and incoherent single scatter on the 2D projections. Single scatter determines a significant fraction of total scatter even for large body-sized phantoms and large field of measurement. Coherent scatter dominates the distribution of total scatter for most of the simulated cases, even for 120 keV. The Compton effect appeared to be less influential with respect to spatial distribution but dominated the overall magnitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18441416     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/10/N02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Quantitative cone-beam CT imaging in radiation therapy using planning CT as a prior: first patient studies.

Authors:  Tianye Niu; Ahmad Al-Basheer; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.

Authors:  Ruben Pauwels; Pisha Pittayapat; Phonkit Sinpitaksakul; Soontra Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Image-domain shading correction for cone-beam CT without prior patient information.

Authors:  Qiyong Fan; Bo Lu; Justin C Park; Tianye Niu; Jonathan G Li; Chihray Liu; Lei Zhu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Low-dose and scatter-free cone-beam CT imaging using a stationary beam blocker in a single scan: phantom studies.

Authors:  Xue Dong; Michael Petrongolo; Tianye Niu; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.238

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.