Literature DB >> 18440525

Estimation of chromosomal imbalances in preimplantation embryos from preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles of reciprocal translocations with or without acrocentric chromosomes.

Chun Kyu Lim1, Jae Won Cho, In Ok Song, Inn Soo Kang, Yong-Dal Yoon, Jin Hyun Jun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate chromosomal imbalances in preimplantation embryos from reciprocal translocation carriers with or without acrocentric chromosomes (Acro-Ch) 13, 14, 15, 21, and 22 in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cycles.
DESIGN: Fluorescence in situ hybridization was applied to PGD cycles for reciprocal translocation carriers.
SETTING: University-based centers for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): Ten and 24 patients of reciprocal translocation with and without Acro-Ch, respectively. INTERVENTION(S): Fluorescence in situ hybridization in biopsied blastomeres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Estimation of meiotic segregation mode in embryos from translocation carriers. RESULT(S): The proportion of alternative segregation for normal or balanced chromosome contents in preimplantation embryos from PGD cycles in reciprocal translocations without Acro-Ch was significantly higher than that with Acro-Ch (26.0% vs. 14.6%). The proportion of interchange trisomy in 3:1 segregation was significantly lower in reciprocal translocations without Acro-Ch than that with Acro-Ch (4.3% vs. 9.5%). CONCLUSION(S): This is the first report that the incidence of alternative segregation producing normal or balanced embryos was relatively low in reciprocal translocations associated with Acro-Ch. Our data may be useful to predict the possibility of normal or balanced embryos and to counsel with reciprocal translocation carriers for PGD-fluorescence in situ hybridization cycles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18440525     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

1.  Benefits and drawbacks of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocations: lessons from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven; Frances A Flinter; Yakoub Khalaf; Alison Lashwood; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  High incidences of chromosomal aberrations and Y chromosome micro-deletions as prominent causes for recurrent pregnancy losses in highly ethnic and consanguineous population.

Authors:  Usma Manzoor; Ina Amin; Arshad A Pandith; Abida Ahmad; Masarat Rashid; Mahrukh H Zargar; Shayesta Rah; Fayaz A Dar; Iqbal Qasim; Dheera Sanadhya
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Risk Factors Affecting Alternate Segregation in Blastocysts From Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles of Autosomal Reciprocal Translocations.

Authors:  Pingyuan Xie; Liang Hu; Yangqin Peng; Yue-Qiu Tan; Keli Luo; Fei Gong; Guangxiu Lu; Ge Lin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Presentation and treatment of subfertile men with balanced translocations: the cleveland clinic experience.

Authors:  Christina B Ching; Edmund Ko; Bryan Hecht; Marissa Smith; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2012-04-30

6.  Chromosome segregation analysis in human embryos obtained from couples involving male carriers of reciprocal or Robertsonian translocation.

Authors:  Ahmet Yilmaz; Xiao Yun Zhang; Jin-Tae Chung; Seang Lin Tan; Hananel Holzer; Asangla Ao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An update of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in gene diseases, chromosomal translocation, and aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Li-Jung Chang; Shee-Uan Chen; Yi-Yi Tsai; Chia-Cheng Hung; Mei-Ya Fang; Yi-Ning Su; Yu-Shih Yang
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2011-09-30

8.  Comparison of the clinical outcomes of day 4 and 5 embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Sun-Hee Lee; Hyoung-Song Lee; Chun Kyu Lim; Yong-Seog Park; Kwang Moon Yang; Dong Wook Park
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2013-09-30

9.  Can Characteristics of Reciprocal Translocations Predict the Chance of Transferable Embryos in PGD Cycles?

Authors:  Elsbeth Dul; Jannie van Echten-Arends; Henk Groen; Peter Kastrop; Lucie Amory-van Wissen; John Engelen; Jolande Land; Edith Coonen; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Criteria to evaluate patterns of segmental and complete aneuploidies in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results suggestive of an inherited balanced translocation or inversion.

Authors:  Alyssa C Snider; Tristan Darvin; Lauren Spor; Adedoyin Akinwole; Cengiz Cinnioglu; Refik Kayali
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.