Literature DB >> 18439891

Side-to-side and within-side variability of 3D bone microarchitecture by conventional micro-computed tomography of paired iliac crest biopsies.

C Chappard1, A Marchadier2, C L Benhamou2.   

Abstract

Bone microarchitecture in osteoporosis can be characterized by examining iliac bone biopsies and treatment effects assessed by comparing a baseline biopsy from one side to a posttreatment biopsy from the other side, a method that assumes limited side-to-side variability. New techniques based on micro-computed tomography (microCT) provide information on the three-dimensional (3D) microarchitecture of bone. We used microCT to measure side-to-side and within-side variability of 3D microarchitectural parameters of trabecular and cortical bone in paired iliac-crest biopsies, one from each side. A Bordier needle trephine was used to collect biopsies from 30 postmenopausal female cadavers (mean age, 73.7+/-10.7 years; range, 55-96 years). Biopsies were chemically defatted then imaged using a desktop microCT scanner (voxel size, 10.77 microm). Parameters measured in trabecular bone consisted of bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV, %), direct trabecular thickness and trabecular spacing (Tb.Th and Tb.Sp, microm) using the sphere method, bone surface/bone volume (BS/BV, mm(-1)), trabecular number (Tb.N, mm(-1)), structure model index (SMI), trabecular pattern factor (Tb.Pf), and degree of anisotropy (DA). In cortical bone, we measured cortical thickness (Cort.Th), porosity (Cort.Porosity), and pore diameter (Po.Dm). For trabecular bone parameters, reproducibility as assessed from two microCT acquisitions ranged from 4.1% to 6.9%. To assess side-to-side variability, we matched the volumes of interest selected in the right and left iliac crests. The mean difference in absolute individual percent variation (mAbsDelta(ind)) between the two sides ranged from 10.8% to 14.8% for all trabecular parameters except Tb.Pf (74%) and SMI (84%). In cortical bone, mAbsDelta(ind) were 11.6% for Po.Dm, 15.1% for Cort.Porosity, and 27.6% for Cort.Th. To assess within-side variability, we divided the trabecular iliac crest volume into three equal parts, one adjacent to each cortex and one in the middle. Values of mAbsDelta(ind) versus the middle part were ranging from 7.6% for Tb.Sp to 26.2% for BV/TV. Thus, within-side variability was similar in magnitude to side-to-side variability. The considerable differences in robustness across trabecular parameters indicate a need for selecting the most stable parameters, most notably for longitudinal studies of small numbers of patients. Acquisition by microCT and image analysis must comply with stringent quality criteria, especially the distance from the cortices must be standardized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18439891     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  4 in total

1.  Variability of trabecular microstructure is age-, gender-, race- and anatomic site-dependent and affects stiffness and stress distribution properties of human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Matthew J Zinno; Janardhan S Yerramshetty; Roger Zauel; David P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  MicroCT morphometry analysis of mouse cancellous bone: intra- and inter-system reproducibility.

Authors:  K Verdelis; L Lukashova; E Atti; P Mayer-Kuckuk; M G E Peterson; S Tetradis; A L Boskey; M C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  High-resolution computed tomography for clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Iliac crest histomorphometry and skeletal heterogeneity in men.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tong; Inari S Burton; Jukka S Jurvelin; Hanna Isaksson; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2016-11-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.