Literature DB >> 18439566

Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs surgeon-dissected grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Marianne O Price1, Kashif M Baig, Jacob W Brubaker, Francis W Price.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether eye bank predissected corneal grafts provide outcomes comparable to surgeon-dissected grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-masked clinical trial.
METHODS: Twenty pairs of donor corneas were harvested. One cornea from each pair was randomized to be precut at an eye bank for next-day use. The surgeon dissected the fellow cornea intraoperatively using a comparable microkeratome and protocol. The corneas were randomly assigned to 40 subjects having DSAEK at a single center. Subjects and evaluators were masked and statistical significance was assessed using the paired t test.
RESULTS: Mean subject age was 71 +/- 12 years and 90% had Fuchs dystrophy. Mean endothelial cell loss was 32% at six months and 34% at one year; the two groups did not differ by a statistically significant amount at either time point (P = .10 and P = .79, respectively). Each group experienced two early dislocations (10%), and grafts were repositioned successfully with a second air bubble. At six months, 28 of 35 patients (80%) had best-corrected vision of 20/40 or better, excluding five patients (12%) with preexisting retinal problems (P = .48). Both groups experienced a mild hyperopic shift (P = .82), and neither had a statistically significant increase in mean refractive cylinder (P = .63). Histology from one subject's eye postmortem demonstrated that endothelial cells had migrated over the exposed edge of the donor stroma a year after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Eye bank precut tissue provided similar endothelial cell loss, visual and refractive outcomes, and detachment rates compared with surgeon-dissected tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18439566     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  34 in total

1.  Machine learning for segmenting cells in corneal endothelium images.

Authors:  Chaitanya Kolluru; Beth A Benetz; Naomi Joseph; Harry J Menegay; Jonathan H Lass; David Wilson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-13

2.  A presentation of culture-positive corneal donors and the effect on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Aida Hajjar Sesé; Jens Lindegaard; Hanne Olsen Julian; Klavs Højgaard-Olsen; Niels Frimodt Møller; Steffen Heegaard
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Surgical strategies to improve visual outcomes in corneal transplantation.

Authors:  M S Rajan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Graft survival and endothelial outcomes in the new era of endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of complication rates and endothelial survival between precut tissue and surgeon-cut tissue by a single DSAEK surgeon.

Authors:  Mark A Terry
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2009-12

6.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Corneal endothelial autocrine trophic factor VIP in a mechanism-based strategy to enhance human donor cornea preservation for transplantation.

Authors:  Shay-Whey Margaret Koh
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Mark A Terry; Giuseppe Lombardo; David D Boozer; Sebastiano Serrao; Pietro Ducoli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  [Perspectives of posterior lamellar keratoplasty. In search of the perfect lamella].

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Precut cornea for Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: experience at a single eye bank.

Authors:  Ashik Mohamed; Sunita Chaurasia; Venkataswamy Chandragiri; Srinivas Kandhibanda; Srinivas Gunnam; Prashant Garg
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.