Literature DB >> 18439175

Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter.

Arash Arya1, Hans Kottkamp, Christopher Piorkowski, Andreas Bollmann, Jin-Hong Gerdes-Li, Sam Riahi, Masahiro Esato, Gerhard Hindricks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A remote magnetic navigation system (MNS) is available and has been used with a 4-mm-tip magnetic catheter for radiofrequency (RF) ablation of some supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias; however, it has not been evaluated for the ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter (AFL). The present study evaluates the feasibility and efficiency of this system and the newly available 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter to perform RF ablation in patients with AFL.
METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients (23 men, mean age 64.6 +/- 9.6 years) underwent RF ablation using a remote MNS. RF ablation was performed with an 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter (70 degrees C, maximum power 70 W, 90 seconds). The endpoint of ablation was complete bidirectional isthmus block. To assess a possible learning curve, procedural data were compared between the first 14 (group 1) and the rest (group 2) of the patients.
RESULTS: The initial rhythm during ablation was AFL in 20 (19 counterclockwise and 1 clockwise) and sinus rhythm in six patients. Due to technical issues, the ablation in the 18th patient could not be done with the MNS, and so we switched to conventional ablation. The remote magnetic navigation and ablation procedure was successful in 24 of the 25 (96%) remaining patients with AFL. In one patient (patient 2), conventional catheter was used to complete the isthmus block after termination of AFL. The procedure, preparation, ablation, and fluoroscopy times (median [range]) were 53 (30-130) minutes, 28 (10-65) minutes, 25 (12-78) minutes, and 7.5 (3.2-20.8) minutes, respectively. Patients in group 2 had shorter procedure (45 [30-70] min vs 80 [57-130] min, P = 0.0001), preparation (25 [10-30] min vs 42 [30-65] min, P = 0.0001), ablation (20 [12-40] min vs 31 [20-78] min, P = 0.002), and fluoroscopy (7.2 [3.2-12.2] min vs 11.0 [5.4-20.8] min, P = 0.014) times. No complication occurred during the procedure.
CONCLUSION: Using a remote MNS and an 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter, ablation of AFL is feasible, safe, and effective. Our data suggest that there is a short learning curve for this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18439175     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01047.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

1.  Impact of nonfluoroscopic MediGuide™ tracking system on radiation exposure in radiofrequency ablation procedures (LESS-RADS registry)-an initial experience.

Authors:  Ajay Vallakati; Yeruva Madhu Reddy; Martin Emert; Pramod Janga; Moussa C Mansour; E Kevin Heist; Rhea Pimentel; Raghuveer Dendi; Donita Atkins; Sudharani Bommana; Srijoy Mahapatra; Michael Heard; Jeremy Ruskin; Loren Berenbom; Buddhadeb Dawn; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Irrigated-Tip Magnetic Catheter Ablation Of AF: ALong-Term Prospective Study In 130 Patients.

Authors:  Julian Chun
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2011-07-15

3.  Atrial Flutter Ablation Using MediGuideTM Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking System: A Novel Technology to Reduce Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Anand Pillai; Madhu Reddy; Michael Heard; Ajay Vallakati; Loren Berenbom; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-10-06

4.  Accurate guidance of a catheter by ultrasound imaging and identification of a catheter tip by pulsed-wave Doppler.

Authors:  Eileen M McMahon; Panupong Jiamsripong; Minako Katayama; Hari P Chaliki; Mostafa Fatemi; Marek Belohlavek
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 5.  From early beginnings to elaborate tools: contribution of German electrophysiology to the interventional treatment of cardiac arrhythmias : The German Cardiac Society welcomes ESC in Munich 2018.

Authors:  Thomas Fink; Michael Schlüter; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Safety and efficacy of the remote magnetic navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardias--a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdi Akca; Ibrahim Önsesveren; Luc Jordaens; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Cavotricuspid Isthmus Anatomy Determines The Success Of Remote Controlled Magnetic Bidirectional Block: A Comparsion Between Magnetic 8-mm Solid Tip And 3.5-mm Magnetic Irrigated Tip Catheter.

Authors:  Buelent Koektuerk; Julian Kr Chun; Erik Wissner; Boris Schmidt; Sabine Ernst; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2011-07-03

8.  Comparison of magnetic navigation system and conventional method in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is magnetic navigation system is more effective and safer than conventional method?

Authors:  Min Seok Choi; Yong-Seog Oh; Sung Won Jang; Ji Hoon Kim; Woo Seung Shin; Ho-Joong Youn; Wook Sung Jung; Man Young Lee; Ki Bae Seong
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Remote Navigation for Complex Arrhythmia.

Authors:  Irina Suman-Horduna; Sonya V Babu-Narayan; Sabine Ernst
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2013-04

Review 10.  Novel strategies in the ablation of typical atrial flutter: role of intracardiac echocardiography.

Authors:  Gábor Bencsik
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2015
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.