Literature DB >> 18438258

Biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral power snatch lifts.

Mike A Lauder1, Jason P Lake.   

Abstract

Biomechanical characteristics of the one-handed dumbbell power snatch (DBPS) were examined to determine whether significant differences existed between unilateral and bilateral weightlifting movements. Kinetic and kinematic movement data were recorded from 10 male weightlifters (mean +/- SD: age: 30.2 +/- 10.2 years; height: 174.2 +/- 4.4 cm; body mass: 81.5 +/- 14.6 kg) during one-handed dumbbell (DB) and traditional barbell (BBPS) power snatch performance with loads of approximately 80% of respective lift one repetition maximums (1RM) with the use of 2 synchronized Kistler force plates and high-speed 3-dimensional video. Results highlighted asymmetry in the ground reaction force and kinematic profile of the DBPS, which deviated from the observed patterns of the bilateral movement. This study found that the nonlifting side (the side corresponding with the hand that did not hold the DB) tended to generate a greater pull phase peak vertical ground reaction forces significantly faster (p = 0.001) than the lifting side (the side corresponding with the hand that held the DB) during the DBPS. In addition, the DBPS nonlifting side catch phase loading rate was approximately double that of the lifting side loading rate (p < 0.05). These results quantify symmetrical deviations in the movement patterns of the unilateral power snatch movement both during the concentric muscular contraction of load vertical displacement, and the loading implications of unilateral landing. This asymmetry supports the contention that unilateral variations of weightlifting movements may provide a different training stimulus to athletes.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18438258     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181660c89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Intersegmental moment analysis characterizes the partial correspondence of jumping and jerking.

Authors:  Daniel J Cleather; Jon E Goodwin; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  CORE MUSCLE ACTIVITY DURING THE CLEAN AND JERK LIFT WITH BARBELL VERSUS SANDBAGS AND WATER BAGS.

Authors:  Joaquin Calatayud; Juan C Colado; Fernando Martin; José Casaña; Markus D Jakobsen; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

3.  External kinetics of the kettlebell snatch in amateur lifters.

Authors:  James A Ross; Justin W L Keogh; Cameron J Wilson; Christian Lorenzen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Modeling record scores in the snatch and its variations in the long-term training of young weightlifters.

Authors:  Adam Czaplicki; Paulina Szyszka; Jarosław Sacharuk; Janusz Jaszczuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.