Literature DB >> 26618060

CORE MUSCLE ACTIVITY DURING THE CLEAN AND JERK LIFT WITH BARBELL VERSUS SANDBAGS AND WATER BAGS.

Joaquin Calatayud1, Juan C Colado1, Fernando Martin1, José Casaña2, Markus D Jakobsen, Lars L Andersen3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
BACKGROUND: While the traditional clean and jerk maneuver implies simultaneous participation of a large number of muscle groups, the use of this exercise with some variations to enhance core muscle activity remains uninvestigated. The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle activity during clean and jerk lift when performed with a barbell, sandbag and a water bag at same absolute load. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive, repeated-measures study.
METHODS: Twenty-one young fit male university students (age: 25 ± 2.66 years; height: 180.71 ± 5.42 cm; body mass: 80.32 ± 9.8 kg; body fat percentage: 12.41 ± 3.56 %) participated. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were recorded from the anterior deltoid (AD), external oblique (OBLIQ), lumbar erector spinae (LUMB), and gluteus medius (GM) and were expressed as a percentage of the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC).
RESULTS: There were no significantly significant differences for AD muscle activity between conditions, whereas muscle activation values for OBLIQ (60%MVIC), GM (29%MVIC) and LUMB (85%MVIC) were significantly higher during the water bag power clean and jerk maneuver when compared with the other conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The clean and jerk is an exercise that may be used to enhance core muscle activity. Performing the maneuver with water bags resulted in higher core muscle activity compared with sandbag and standard barbell versions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Muscle activation; olympic lift; resistance training; weight lifting

Year:  2015        PMID: 26618060      PMCID: PMC4637915     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  25 in total

1.  Muscle force output and electromyographic activity in squats with various unstable surfaces.

Authors:  Atle H Saeterbakken; Marius S Fimland
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Muscle activation when performing the chest press and shoulder press on a stable bench vs. a Swiss ball.

Authors:  Brandon P Uribe; Jared W Coburn; Lee E Brown; Daniel A Judelson; Andy V Khamoui; Diamond Nguyen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Deadlift muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions.

Authors:  Iván Chulvi-Medrano; Xavier García-Massó; Juan C Colado; Carlos Pablos; Joao Alves de Moraes; Maria A Fuster
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Trunk muscle activity increases with unstable squat movements.

Authors:  Kenneth Anderson; David G Behm
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-02

5.  Electromyographic analysis of the gluteus medius in five weight-bearing exercises.

Authors:  David A Krause; Rebecca S Jacobs; Katie E Pilger; Becky R Sather; Seth P Sibunka; John H Hollman
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Muscle activations under varying lifting speeds and intensities during bench press.

Authors:  Akihiro Sakamoto; Peter James Sinclair
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Similar electromyographic activities of lower limbs between squatting on a reebok core board and ground.

Authors:  Yongming Li; Chunmei Cao; Xiaoping Chen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Motor control of the trunk during a modified clean and jerk lift.

Authors:  M Eriksson Crommert; M M Ekblom; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 9.  Can local muscles augment stability in the hip? A narrative literature review.

Authors:  T H Retchford; K M Crossley; A Grimaldi; J L Kemp; S M Cowan
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.041

10.  A meta-analysis of core stability exercise versus general exercise for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Xue-Qiang Wang; Jie-Jiao Zheng; Zhuo-Wei Yu; Xia Bi; Shu-Jie Lou; Jing Liu; Bin Cai; Ying-Hui Hua; Mark Wu; Mao-Ling Wei; Hai-Min Shen; Yi Chen; Yu-Jian Pan; Guo-Hui Xu; Pei-Jie Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Differences in trunk and lower extremity muscle activity during squatting exercise with and without hammer swing.

Authors:  Koji Murofushi; Tomoki Oshikawa; Koji Kaneoka; Hiroshi Akuzawa; Daisuke Yamaguchi; Sho Mitomo; Hidetaka Furuya; Kenji Hirohata; Kazuyoshi Yagishita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Muscle activity in asymmetric bench press among resistance-trained individuals.

Authors:  Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Tom Erik J Solstad; David G Behm; Nicolay Stien; Matthew Peter Shaw; Helene Pedersen; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.078

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.