Literature DB >> 18436632

Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets.

Daniel J Goble1, Susan H Brown.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to determine the extent to which "sensory dominance" exists in right-handers with respect to the utilization of proprioceptive versus visual feedback. Thirteen right-handed adults performed two target-matching tasks using instrumented manipulanda. In the proprioceptive matching task, the left or right elbow of blindfolded subjects was passively extended by a torque motor system to a target position and held for 3 s before being returned to the start position. The target angle was then matched with either the ipsilateral or contralateral arm. In the second task, visual matching, circular targets were briefly projected to either side of a visual fixation point located in front of the subject. Subjects then matched the target positions with a laser pointer by moving either the ipsilateral or contralateral arm. Overall, marked arm differences in accuracy were seen based on the type of sensory feedback used for target presentation. For the proprioceptive matching task errors were smaller for the nonpreferred left arm, whereas during the visual matching task smaller errors were found for the preferred right arm. These results suggest a left arm/right hemisphere advantage for proprioceptive feedback processing and a right arm/left hemisphere advantage for visual information processing. Such asymmetries may reflect fundamental differences between the two arm/hemisphere systems during the performance of bimanual tasks where the preferred arm requires visual guidance to manipulate an object, whereas the nonpreferred stabilizes that object on the basis of proprioceptive feedback.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436632     DOI: 10.1152/jn.90259.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  62 in total

1.  Proprioceptive recalibration in the right and left hands following abrupt visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Danielle Salomonczyk; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Compromised encoding of proprioceptively determined joint angles in older adults: the role of working memory and attentional load.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Marianne A Mousigian; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Eye-hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: temporal aspects.

Authors:  Divya Srinivasan; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Plastic changes in hand proprioception following force-field motor learning.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Joaquin A Anguera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Proprioceptive ability at the lips and jaw measured using the same psychophysical discrimination task.

Authors:  Ellie Frayne; Susan Coulson; Roger Adams; Glen Croxson; Gordon Waddington
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance.

Authors:  Richard B Westrick; Joseph M Miller; Scott D Carow; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

7.  Joint position sense during a reaching task improves at targets located closer to the head but is unaffected by instruction.

Authors:  Jacqlyn King; Andrew Karduna
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Novel magnetomechanical MR compatible vibrational device for producing kinesthetic illusion during fMRI.

Authors:  Sarah J Carr; Kristin Borreggine; Jeremiah Heilman; Mark Griswold; Benjamin L Walter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  The neural control of bimanual movements in the elderly: Brain regions exhibiting age-related increases in activity, frequency-induced neural modulation, and task-specific compensatory recruitment.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Jeroen De Vos; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Motor asymmetry in elite fencers.

Authors:  Selcuk Akpinar; Robert L Sainburg; Sadettin Kirazci; Andrzej Przybyla
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.