Literature DB >> 18436222

Preferred and actual delivery mode after a cesarean in London, UK.

Dan Selo-Ojeme1, Nashwa Abulhassan, Ramna Mandal, Seema Tirlapur, Uati Selo-Ojeme.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the delivery mode preferred by pregnant women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and to investigate the relationship between preferred and actual mode of delivery.
METHOD: We reviewed the records of 215 women who were delivered in a London hospital with a history of 1 cesarean delivery. Women who planned an elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) were compared with those who planned a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).
RESULTS: Although 55.3% chose VBAC overall, only 37.8% of those who chose it were delivered by it, whereas 94.8% of those who chose ERCS were delivered by ERCS. Nonwhite women were more likely to choose VBAC than white women (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-6.1) but less likely to be deliver by it (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.68).
CONCLUSION: In this study, VBAC was the method of delivery preferred by most women. Nonwhite women were more likely to choose VBAC over ERCS but less likely to be delivered by VBAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436222     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  5 in total

1.  Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Karen B Eden; Nicole Marshall; Leonardo Pereira; Aaron B Caughey; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  The utility of clinical care pathways in determining perinatal outcomes for women with one previous caesarean section; a retrospective service evaluation.

Authors:  Sikolia Z Wanyonyi; Robinson N Karuga
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Decision-making during trial of labour after caesarean; a qualitative study with gynaecologists.

Authors:  Anna L Rietveld; Christianne J M de Groot; Pim W Teunissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Low risk pregnancies after a cesarean section: Determinants of trial of labor and its failure.

Authors:  Sjur Lehmann; Elham Baghestan; Per E Børdahl; Lorentz M Irgens; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.