Literature DB >> 18436005

Measuring patient preference and surgeon choice.

Jane M Young1, Michael J Solomon, James D Harrison, Glenn Salkeld, Phyllis Butow.   

Abstract

One of the major barriers to randomized trials in the field of surgery is the presence of strong preferences for one of the treatment options. Patients and surgeons who favor strongly a particular treatment approach are usually reluctant to participate in trials where operative intervention is determined on the basis of randomization. This then affects both the feasibility of the trial in terms of achieving the required sample size as well as the generalizability of the study's findings. Therefore, measurement of patient and surgeon preference is a crucial component of the feasibility assessment for surgery trials. In this article, we introduce the Prospective Measure of Preference, which is a novel method to measure preferences that has been designed to accommodate the complexity of surgical decision-making. We also present a simple method to measure individual and community equipoise among expert clinicians to assess the feasibility of future randomized trials in surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436005     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  15 in total

1.  [Ethical and empirical limitations of randomized controlled trials].

Authors:  Franz Porzsolt; Hartmut Kliemt
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2008-12-20

2.  [Scientific evidence and the cost of innovations in the health-care system].

Authors:  Franz Porzsolt; Jonas Schreyögg
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2009-08-23

3.  Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Mathew Baldwin; Cushla Cooper; Navraj S Nagra; Joanna C Crocker; Molly Glaze; Gemma Greenall; Amar Rangan; Lucksy Kottam; Jonathan L Rees; Dair Farrar-Hockley; Naomi Merritt; Sally Hopewell; David Beard; Michael Thomas; Melina Dritsaki; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 4.  Measuring outcomes in oncology treatment: the importance of patient-centered outcomes.

Authors:  Aundrea Oliver; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Why don't women participate? A qualitative study on non-participation in a surgical randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Gopinath; A R B Smith; C Holland; F M Reid
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The surgical trends and time-frame comparison of primary surgery for stress urinary incontinence, 2006-2010 vs 1997-2005: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study.

Authors:  Chia-Jen Wu; Yat-Ching Tong; Sheng-Mou Hsiao; Ching-Chung Liang; So-Jung Liang; Shih-Feng Weng; Ming-Ping Wu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a survey within a mixed methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Paul Hilton; Andy Bryant; Denise Howel; Elaine McColl; Brian S Buckley; Malcolm Lucas; Douglas G Tincello; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Does self monitoring of blood glucose as opposed to urinalysis provide additional benefit in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes receiving structured education? The DESMOND SMBG randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Helen M Dallosso; Helen C Eborall; Heather Daly; Lorraine Martin-Stacey; Jane Speight; Kathryn Realf; Marian E Carey; Michael J Campbell; Simon Dixon; Kamlesh Khunti; Melanie J Davies; Simon Heller
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  CORR Insights®: Compliant Compression Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur Is Durable Despite Minimal Bone Formation in the Compression Segment.

Authors:  Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  The feasibility of performing a randomised controlled trial for femoroacetabular impingement surgery.

Authors:  A J R Palmer; G E R Thomas; T C B Pollard; I Rombach; A Taylor; N Arden; D J Beard; A J Andrade; A J Carr; S Glyn-Jones
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.