| Literature DB >> 18433504 |
Brenda Y Hernandez1, Thuong Vu Nguyen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women in southern Vietnam where its incidence is one of the highest observed worldwide.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18433504 PMCID: PMC2405771 DOI: 10.1186/1750-9378-3-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Agent Cancer ISSN: 1750-9378 Impact factor: 2.965
Figure 1Prevalence of cervical HPV in sex workers by age, Soctrang province, Vietnam.
Genotypes detected in cervical HPV-positive1 sex workers, Soc Trang province, Vietnam.
| HPV genotype | Frequency | % |
| 522 | 50 | 11.4 |
| 162 | 29 | 6.6 |
| 582 | 19 | 4.3 |
| 62 | 19 | 4.3 |
| 512 | 18 | 4.1 |
| 182 | 17 | 3.9 |
| 592 | 13 | 3.0 |
| 11 | 12 | 2.7 |
| 392 | 11 | 2.5 |
| 84 | 11 | 2.5 |
| 562 | 10 | 2.3 |
| 70 | 10 | 2.3 |
| 662 | 9 | 2.1 |
| 682 | 9 | 2.1 |
| 54 | 8 | 1.8 |
| 55 | 8 | 1.8 |
| 61 | 8 | 1.8 |
| 71 | 8 | 1.8 |
| 6 | 7 | 1.6 |
| 332 | 6 | 1.4 |
| 532 | 6 | 1.4 |
| 72 | 6 | 1.4 |
| 81 | 6 | 1.4 |
| 262 | 5 | 1.1 |
| 732 | 5 | 1.1 |
| CP6108 | 5 | 1.1 |
| 452 | 4 | 0.9 |
| 83 | 4 | 0.9 |
| 40 | 3 | 0.7 |
| 42 | 3 | 0.7 |
| 67 | 3 | 0.7 |
| 312 | 2 | 0.5 |
| 352 | 2 | 0.5 |
| 822 | 2 | 0.5 |
| 64 | 1 | 0.2 |
| Untyped | 99 | 22.6 |
| Total | 438 | 100 |
1239 HPV+ sex workers; 88 HPV+ for 2 or more genotypes
2Oncogenic/probable oncogenic genotypes
Cervical HPV infection and characteristics of sex workers, Soc Trang province, Vietnam
| No. (%) | Any HPV Adj. PR1 (95% CI) | Oncogenic HPV Adj. PR1 (95% CI) | Multiple HPV Adj. PR1 (95% CI) | |
| Age (yrs.) | ||||
| <20 | 45 (16%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 20–29 | 175 (62%) | 0.83 (0.62–1.10) | 0.72 (0.48–1.09) | 0.72 (0.41–1.25) |
| 30+ | 62 (22%) | 0.78 (0.53–1.16) | 0.79 (0.33–1.87) | 0.88 (0.37–2.10) |
| p trend = 0.35 | p trend = 0.12 | p trend = 0.07 | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Kinh | 230 (82%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Other | 52 (18%) | 1.14 (0.92–1.41) | 1.10 (0.73–1.64) | 1.02 (0.60–1.73) |
| Marital Status | ||||
| Not Single | 136 (48%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Single | 146 (52%) | 1.02 (0.83–1.27) | 1.29 (0.83–1.98) | 1.68 (0.83–6.79) |
| Education | ||||
| None | 43 (15%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Primary School | 136 (48%) | 0.94 (0.73–1.22) | 0.78 (0.48–1.25) | 0.63 (0.37–1.08) |
| Secondary-high school | 103 (37%) | 0.80 (0.59–1.10) | 0.57 (0.32–1.04) | 0.43 (0.23–0.79) |
| Age of regular partner (yrs.)2 | ||||
| <30 | 72 (47%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 30+ | 81 (53%) | 1.39 (1.09–1.76) | 1.60 (1.13–2.27) | 1.78 (1.14–2.78) |
| Regular partner has other female partners2,3 | ||||
| No | 54 (36%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 97 (64%) | 1.27 (1.04–1.54) | 2.01 (1.34–3.00) | 2.17 (1.30–3.62) |
| Age at first sex4 | ||||
| ὄ 15 yrs | 11 (4%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| >15 yrs | 270 (96%) | 0.84 (0.58–1.20) | 1.09 (0.54–2.19) | 0.77 (0.35–1.69) |
| Duration of commercial sex work | ||||
| <1 year | 54 (19%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 1 – 3 years | 125 (44%) | 1.11 (0.79–1.57) | 0.88 (0.61–1.27) | 0.97 (0.65–1.45) |
| > 3 years | 103 (37%) | 1.16 (0.78–1.72) | 0.96 (0.62–1.49) | 1.20 (0.76–1.88) |
| p trend = 0.11 | p trend = 0.02 | p trend = 0.03 | ||
| Venue for sex work5 | ||||
| Indirect venues | 148 (52%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Direct venues | 134 (48%) | 1.03 (0.87–1.22) | 1.11 (0.77–1.59) | 0.99 (0.68–1.44) |
| No. of clients per month (average) | ||||
| <10 | 97 (34%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 10–25 | 85 (30%) | 1.00 (0.88–1.15) | 1.08 (0.79–1.46) | 1.27 (0.75–2.13) |
| >25 | 100 (36%) | 0.64 (0.49–0.83) | 0.43 (0.27–0.70) | 0.52 (0.29–0.94) |
| p trend = 0.16 | p trend = 0.85 | p trend = 0.69 | ||
| Oral-penile contact | ||||
| Never | 239 (85%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 43 (15%) | 1.29 (0.94–1.78) | 1.45 (0.74–2.82) | 1.51 (0.70–6.55) |
| Anal-penile contact | ||||
| Never | 272 (96%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 10 (4%) | 0.72 (0.40–1.34) | 0.36 (0.14–0.92) | 0.26 (0.10–0.69) |
| Condom use with regular clients6 | ||||
| Not always | 37 (16%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Always | 190 (84%) | 1.13 (0.88–1.44) | 1.58 (0.98–2.55) | 1.68 (0.84–3.36) |
| Condom use with irregular clients7 | ||||
| Not always | 29 (13% | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Always | 189 (87%) | 0.96 (0.70–1.30) | 0.95 (0.69–1.30) | 0.94 (0.60–1.49) |
| Oral contraceptives4 | ||||
| Never | 261 (93%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 20 (7%) | 1.06 (0.81–1.40) | 1.32 (0.84–2.07) | 1.41 (0.75–2.64) |
| Intrauterine device4 | ||||
| Never | 218 (78%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 63 (22%) | 0.89 (0.69–1.13) | 0.63 (0.33–1.20 | 0.52 (0.28–0.99) |
| Withdrawal4 | ||||
| Never | 198 (70%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 83 (30%) | 0.80 (0.67–0.96) | 0.62 (0.42–0.89 | 0.58 (0.30–1.12) |
| Illegal drugs4 | ||||
| Never | 255 (91%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 26 (9%) | 0.76 (0.54–1.06) | 0.61 (0.33–1.13) | 1.42 (0.80–2.52) |
| Pregnant4 | ||||
| Never | 144 (51%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 138 (49%) | 1.00 (0.81–1.24 | 0.95 (0.61–1.46) | 1.06 (0.59–1.92) |
| Current STI status4 | ||||
| Trichomonas | ||||
| Negative | 258 (92%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 23 (8%) | 1.04 (0.78–1.39) | 1.30 (0.84–2.02) | 1.51 (0.76–3.00) |
| Bacterial vaginosis | ||||
| Negative | 200 (71%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 81 (29%) | 1.10 (0.93–1.31) | 1.07 (0.75–1.52) | 1.30 (0.58–2.00) |
| Yeast | ||||
| Negative | 253 (90%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 28 (10%) | 1.20 (0.97–1.49) | 0.80 (0.51–1.25) | 0.81 (0.39–1.69) |
| Syphilis | ||||
| Negative | 270 (96%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 11 (4%) | 1.34 (0.84–2.16) | 1.38 (0.65–2.93) | 1.05 (0.42–2.67) |
| HIV | ||||
| Negative | 276 (98%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 5 (2%) | 1.57 (0.98–2.51) | 3.01 (1.01–9.00) | 2.87 (0.69–12.00) |
| Gonorrhea | ||||
| Negative | 253 (90%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 28 (10%) | 1.06 (0.91–1.24) | 0.92 (0.89–1.45) | 0.98 (0.68–2.86) |
| Chlamydia | ||||
| Negative | 161 (57%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 120 (43%) | 0.99 (0.76–1.28) | 0.95 (0.66–1.37) | 0.98 (0.64–1.50) |
1Prevalence ratio, adjusted for all variables
2153 FSW had a regular male partner
3 Responses missing from 2 subjects
4 Response missing from 1 subject
5 Direct venues include streets, parks, bus stops, boats, ferry piers, brothels, small cafés, and guesthouses; indirect venues include hotels, restaurants, massage parlors, karaoke lounges, bars, and barbershops.
6 227 FSW serviced regular clients
7 218 FSW serviced irregular clients
Factors associated with cervical HPV infection in sex workers, Soc Trang province, Vietnam
| Any HPV Adj. PR1 (95% CI) | Oncogenic HPV Adj. PR1 (95% CI) | Multiple HPV Adj. PR1 (95% CI) | |
| Education | |||
| None | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Primary School | 0.92 (0.73–1.15) | 0.80 (0.58–1.11) | 0.82 (0.56–1.21) |
| Secondary-high school | 0.80 (0.61–1.04) | 0.63 (0.42–0.93) | 0.61 (0.38–0.99) |
| No. of clients per month (average) | |||
| <10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 10–25 | 1.03 (0.92–1.16) | 1.06 (0.87–1.30) | 1.14 (0.83–1.57) |
| >25 | 0.78 (0.65–0.94) | 0.66 (0.48–0.92) | 0.70 (0.47–1.06) |
| p trend = 0.93 | p trend = 0.43 | p trend = 0.49 | |
| Regular partner has other female partners2,3 | |||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 1.22 (1.03–1.44) | 1.75 (1.34–2.28) | 1.91 (1.41–2.60) |
| Intrauterine device4 | |||
| Never | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 0.85 (0.68–1.06) | 0.58 (0.31–1.08) | 0.53 (0.29–0.99) |
| Withdrawal4 | |||
| Never | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Ever | 0.84 (0.73–0.97) | 0.68 (0.53–0.87) | 0.60 (0.43–0.83) |
| HIV4 | |||
| Negative | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 1.20 (1.01–1.42) | 1.42 (1.08–1.88) | 1.45 (1.01–2.10) |
| Age of regular partner (yrs.)2 | |||
| <30 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 30+ | 1.21 (1.03–1.44) | 1.16 (0.92–1.46) | 1.22 (0.86–1.73) |
1Adjusted for all variables listed in addition to age, condom use with regular clients, gonorrhea, sex work venue
2153 FSW had a regular male partner
3 Responses missing from 2 subjects
4 Response missing from 1 subject