Literature DB >> 18432482

On the costs of refocusing items in working memory: a matter of inhibition or decay?

Markus Janczyk1, Carolin Wienrich, Wilfried Kunde.   

Abstract

The present study investigates the mental processes that are applied to previously attended items of working memory. In an object-switching task, participants counted the number of sequentially presented objects. In Experiment 1 the processing time increased when the object category switched from the prior trial compared to a repetition. More importantly, the further in the past the last instance of a current category was presented, the more processing time was necessary - an observation suggesting passive decay rather than inhibition of previously attended items. However, results differed when only two object categories were employed. Experiment 2 suggests that the lack of a clear indication of decay with small numbers of categories was due to participants' expectancy of category switches rather than repetitions. Taken together, the results suggest that working memory items become less accessible the longer they have not been attended to, when strategic processes are controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18432482     DOI: 10.1080/09658210801941742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  8 in total

1.  Stimulus-response bindings contribute to item switch costs in working memory.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-17

2.  Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Switching attention from internal to external information processing: A review of the literature and empirical support of the resource sharing account.

Authors:  Sam Verschooren; Sebastian Schindler; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

4.  Restoration of Attention by Rest in a Multitasking World: Theory, Methodology, and Empirical Evidence.

Authors:  Frank Schumann; Michael B Steinborn; Jens Kürten; Liyu Cao; Barbara Friederike Händel; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-01

5.  Selection in working memory is resource-demanding: Concurrent task effects on the retro-cue effect.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Lin; Edyta Sasin; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The role of task-related learned representations in explaining asymmetries in task switching.

Authors:  Ayla Barutchu; Stefanie I Becker; Olivia Carter; Robert Hester; Neil L Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Focus of Attention in Visual Working Memory: Protection of Focused Representations and Its Individual Variation.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The (Un)Clear Effects of Invalid Retro-Cues.

Authors:  Marcel Gressmann; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.