Estimation of energy expenditure in a work environment: comparison of accelerometry and oxygen consumption/heart rate regression.

The aim of this study was to compare estimation of energy expenditure (EE) in working environments, either from accelerometry or from an individual oxygen consumption/heart rate (VO(2)/HR) regression curve. The study participants were 46 volunteer workers aged 27+/-6 years old. A significant correlation between EE predicted by the VO(2)/HR curve and the accelerometer was observed (r=0.78, p <0.01). However, more disparities were observed between the two methods when the mean job intensity was not within 16% and 23% higher than resting HR. The accelerometer overestimated by a mean of 34.4% the prediction by VO(2)/HR regression if the intensity of the task was lower than a total of 1000 kcal/shift and underestimated the prediction by a mean of -24.9% if EE estimation of the work shift was higher than a total of 1500 kcal/shift. Despite a high correlation between both methods in the whole group, EE evaluated by accelerometry does not correspond to EE predicted by the VO(2)/HR regression curves when evaluated individually.