Literature DB >> 18431691

A mathematical approach predicting the number of events in different tumors.

Ralf J Rieker1, Josef Hoegel, Michael A Kern, Christina Steger, Sebastian Aulmann, Gunhild Mechtersheimer, Peter Schirmacher, Hendrik Blaeker.   

Abstract

Supported by different investigations, multi-step models for tumorigenesis have been proposed for epithelial tumors. The age specific incidence of some cancers shows an exponential rise with increasing patient age. Yet, the onset and the slope of incidence curves varies between tumor types. One simple explanation for this disparity is that the number of mutations required for transformation differs in various tissues. We used a homogeneous Poisson process to estimate the number of events (N) and the intensity or event rate (lambda) that might be needed for cancer development in various tissues (colon, prostate, oralpharynx, larynx). Estimations were performed, including 95% confidence intervals, for the male and female population. The expected number of events needed was higher in adenocarcinomas (colorectal carcinoma: N approximately 10 for females and N approximately 11.0 for males; prostatic cancer: N approximately 23) than in squamous cell carcinomas (oropharynx: N approximately 5-6 for females and N approximately 6 for males; larynx: N approximately 7 for females and N approximately 8 males). Still, alternative models fixing N to values within the 95% confidence intervals determined, showed good coincidence with epidemiological data. Although the herein applied mathematical model neglects several biologic conditions, especially a presumed acceleration of mutation rates after tumor initiation it offers a plausible theory for the given epidemiologic data and matches with molecular biologic findings in the investigated cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18431691     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-008-9050-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  18 in total

1.  A hypothesis for the origin of cancer foci.

Authors:  J C FISHER; J H HOLLOMON
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Multistage carcinogenesis and lung cancer mortality in three cohorts.

Authors:  William D Hazelton; Mark S Clements; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Aging and genome maintenance: lessons from the mouse?

Authors:  Paul Hasty; Judith Campisi; Jan Hoeijmakers; Harry van Steeg; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Rare loss-of-function mutation of a death receptor gene in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  S I Pai; G S Wu; N Ozören; L Wu; J Jen; D Sidransky; W S El-Deiry
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Oncogenic mutations of PIK3CA in human cancers.

Authors:  Yardena Samuels; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mutational analysis of the tyrosine phosphatome in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Zhenghe Wang; Dong Shen; D Williams Parsons; Alberto Bardelli; Jason Sager; Steve Szabo; Janine Ptak; Natalie Silliman; Brock A Peters; Michiel S van der Heijden; Giovanni Parmigiani; Hai Yan; Tian-Li Wang; Greg Riggins; Steven M Powell; James K V Willson; Sanford Markowitz; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A two-stage theory of carcinogenesis in relation to the age distribution of human cancer.

Authors:  P ARMITAGE; R DOLL
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1957-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  P ARMITAGE; R DOLL
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1954-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fixation times in differentiation and evolution in the presence of bottlenecks, deserts, and oases.

Authors:  Tom Chou; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Evaluating the number of stages in development of squamous cell and adenocarcinomas across cancer sites using human population-based cancer modeling.

Authors:  Julia Kravchenko; Igor Akushevich; Amy P Abernethy; H Kim Lyerly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.