Literature DB >> 18430940

Multiple rescue factors within a Wolbachia strain.

Sofia Zabalou1, Angeliki Apostolaki, Savvas Pattas, Zoe Veneti, Charalampos Paraskevopoulos, Ioannis Livadaras, George Markakis, Terry Brissac, Hervé Merçot, Kostas Bourtzis.   

Abstract

Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is expressed when infected males are crossed with either uninfected females or females infected with Wolbachia of different CI specificity. In diploid insects, CI results in embryonic mortality, apparently due to the the loss of the paternal set of chromosomes, usually during the first mitotic division. The molecular basis of CI has not been determined yet; however, several lines of evidence suggest that Wolbachia exhibits two distinct sex-dependent functions: in males, Wolbachia somehow "imprints" the paternal chromosomes during spermatogenesis (mod function), whereas in females, the presence of the same Wolbachia strain(s) is able to restore embryonic viability (resc function). On the basis of the ability of Wolbachia to induce the modification and/or rescue functions in a given host, each bacterial strain can be classified as belonging in one of the four following categories: mod(+) resc(+), mod(-) resc(+), mod(-) resc(-), and mod(+) resc(-). A so-called "suicide" mod(+) resc(-) strain has not been found in nature yet. Here, a combination of embryonic cytoplasmic injections and introgression experiments was used to transfer nine evolutionary, distantly related Wolbachia strains (wYak, wTei, wSan, wRi, wMel, wHa, wAu, wNo, and wMa) into the same host background, that of Drosophila simulans (STCP strain), a highly permissive host for CI expression. We initially characterized the modification and rescue properties of the Wolbachia strains wYak, wTei, and wSan, naturally present in the yakuba complex, upon their transfer into D. simulans. Confocal microscopy and multilocus sequencing typing (MLST) analysis were also employed for the evaluation of the CI properties. We also tested the compatibility relationships of wYak, wTei, and wSan with all other Wolbachia infections. So far, the cytoplasmic incompatibility properties of different Wolbachia variants are explained assuming a single pair of modification and rescue factors specific to each variant. This study shows that a given Wolbachia variant can possess multiple rescue determinants corresponding to different CI systems. In addition, our results: (a) suggest that wTei appears to behave in D. simulans as a suicide mod(+) resc(-) strain, (b) unravel unique CI properties, and (c) provide a framework to understand the diversity and the evolution of new CI-compatibility types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18430940      PMCID: PMC2323804          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.086488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  67 in total

1.  Recombination confounds interpretations of Wolbachia evolution.

Authors:  F M Jiggins; J H von Der Schulenburg; G D Hurst; M E Majerus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from São Tomé.

Authors:  D Lachaise; M Harry; M Solignac; F Lemeunier; V Bénassi; M L Cariou
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Bidirectional incompatibility between conspecific populations of Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  S L O'Neill; T L Karr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolution of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Authors:  Sylvain Charlat; Androniki Nirgianaki; Kostas Bourtzis; Hervé Merçot
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Dynamics of double and single Wolbachia infections in Drosophila simulans from New Caledonia.

Authors:  A C James; M D Dean; M E McMahon; J W O Ballard
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Wolbachia infection and cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila species.

Authors:  K Bourtzis; A Nirgianaki; G Markakis; C Savakis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Wolbachia variant that induces two distinct reproductive phenotypes in different hosts.

Authors:  T Sasaki; N Massaki; T Kubo
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: polymorphism and levels of cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Authors:  Hervé Merçot; Sylvain Charlat
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Wolbachia superinfections and the expression of cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Authors:  S P Sinkins; H R Braig; S L O'Neill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Natural Wolbachia infections in the Drosophila yakuba species complex do not induce cytoplasmic incompatibility but fully rescue the wRi modification.

Authors:  Sofia Zabalou; Sylvain Charlat; Androniki Nirgianaki; Daniel Lachaise; Hervé Merçot; Kostas Bourtzis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  52 in total

1.  Tripartite associations among bacteriophage WO, Wolbachia, and host affected by temperature and age in Tetranychus urticae.

Authors:  Ming-Hong Lu; Kai-Jun Zhang; Xiao-Yue Hong
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Superinfection of cytoplasmic incompatibility-inducing Wolbachia is not additive in Orius strigicollis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae).

Authors:  M Watanabe; K Miura; M S Hunter; E Wajnberg
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Wolbachia do not live by reproductive manipulation alone: infection polymorphism in Drosophila suzukii and D. subpulchrella.

Authors:  Christopher A Hamm; David J Begun; Alexandre Vo; Chris C R Smith; Perot Saelao; Amanda O Shaver; John Jaenike; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Symmetric and asymmetric mitotic segregation patterns influence Wolbachia distribution in host somatic tissue.

Authors:  Roger Albertson; Catharina Casper-Lindley; Jian Cao; Uyen Tram; William Sullivan
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Pathogenicity of life-shortening Wolbachia in Aedes albopictus after transfer from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Eunho Suh; David R Mercer; Yuqing Fu; Stephen L Dobson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Rapid evolution of Wolbachia incompatibility types.

Authors:  Olivier Duron; Jennifer Bernard; Célestine M Atyame; Emilie Dumas; Mylène Weill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Wolbachia strengthens cardinium-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in the spider mite Tetranychus piercei McGregor.

Authors:  Lu-Yu Zhu; Kai-Jun Zhang; Yan-Kai Zhang; Cheng Ge; Tetsuo Gotoh; Xiao-Yue Hong
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 9.  Transinfection: a method to investigate Wolbachia-host interactions and control arthropod-borne disease.

Authors:  G L Hughes; J L Rasgon
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.585

10.  The native Wolbachia endosymbionts of Drosophila melanogaster and Culex quinquefasciatus increase host resistance to West Nile virus infection.

Authors:  Robert L Glaser; Mark A Meola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.