OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based review of measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional impairment, with a specific focus on their use in the field of pediatric psychology. METHODS: As part of a larger survey of pediatric psychologists from the Society of Pediatric Psychology e-mail listserv (American Psychological Association, APA, Division 54), 16 measures were selected for this psychometric review. Measures that qualified for the review fell into one of the following three categories: (a) generic HRQOL scales, (b) disease-specific quality of life scales, and (c) functional impairment rating scales. RESULTS: Psychometric characteristics (i.e., three types of reliability, two types of validity) were strong for the majority of measures reviewed, with 12 of the 16 measures meeting "well-established" evidence-based assessment criteria. Strengths and weaknesses of existing measures were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for future work in this area of assessment are presented, including suggestions that further validation and exploration of measure properties such as factor analysis and changes in HRQOL over time be conducted.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based review of measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional impairment, with a specific focus on their use in the field of pediatric psychology. METHODS: As part of a larger survey of pediatric psychologists from the Society of Pediatric Psychology e-mail listserv (American Psychological Association, APA, Division 54), 16 measures were selected for this psychometric review. Measures that qualified for the review fell into one of the following three categories: (a) generic HRQOL scales, (b) disease-specific quality of life scales, and (c) functional impairment rating scales. RESULTS: Psychometric characteristics (i.e., three types of reliability, two types of validity) were strong for the majority of measures reviewed, with 12 of the 16 measures meeting "well-established" evidence-based assessment criteria. Strengths and weaknesses of existing measures were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for future work in this area of assessment are presented, including suggestions that further validation and exploration of measure properties such as factor analysis and changes in HRQOL over time be conducted.
Authors: Louis S Matza; Andrine R Swensen; Emuella M Flood; Kristina Secnik; Nancy Kline Leidy Journal: Value Health Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Keeley J Pratt; Angela L Lamson; Melvin S Swanson; Suzanne Lazorick; David N Collier Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Susan T Iannaccone; Linda S Hynan; Anne Morton; Renee Buchanan; Christine A Limbers; James W Varni Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Frederick R Adler; Paul Aurora; David H Barker; Mark L Barr; Laura S Blackwell; Otto H Bosma; Samuel Brown; D R Cox; Judy L Jensen; Geoffrey Kurland; George D Nossent; Alexandra L Quittner; Walter M Robinson; Sandy L Romero; Helen Spencer; Stuart C Sweet; Wim van der Bij; J Vermeulen; Erik A M Verschuuren; Elianne J L E Vrijlandt; William Walsh; Marlyn S Woo; Theodore G Liou Journal: Proc Am Thorac Soc Date: 2009-12
Authors: William T Zempsky; Tonya M Palermo; John M Corsi; Amy S Lewandowski; Chuan Zhou; James F Casella Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.037
Authors: Martina Jürgensen; Anke Lux; Sebastian Benedikt Wien; Eva Kleinemeier; Olaf Hiort; Ute Thyen Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.183