Literature DB >> 18430648

You are what your mother eats: evidence for maternal preconception diet influencing foetal sex in humans.

Fiona Mathews1, Paul J Johnson, Andrew Neil.   

Abstract

Facultative adjustment of sex ratios by mothers occurs in some animals, and has been linked to resource availability. In mammals, the search for consistent patterns is complicated by variations in mating systems, social hierarchies and litter sizes. Humans have low fecundity, high maternal investment and a potentially high differential between the numbers of offspring produced by sons and daughters: these conditions should favour the evolution of facultative sex ratio variation. Yet little is known of natural mechanisms of sex allocation in humans. Here, using data from 740 British women who were unaware of their foetus's gender, we show that foetal sex is associated with maternal diet at conception. Fifty six per cent of women in the highest third of preconceptional energy intake bore boys, compared with 45% in the lowest third. Intakes during pregnancy were not associated with sex, suggesting that the foetus does not manipulate maternal diet. Our results support hypotheses predicting investment in costly male offspring when resources are plentiful. Dietary changes may therefore explain the falling proportion of male births in industrialized countries. The results are relevant to the current debate about the artificial selection of offspring sex in fertility treatment and commercial 'gender clinics'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18430648      PMCID: PMC2602810          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  44 in total

1.  Facultative adjustment of mammalian sex ratios in support of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: evidence for a mechanism.

Authors:  Elissa Z Cameron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Maternal undernutrition and the sex ratio at birth in Ethiopia: evidence from a national sample.

Authors:  Aryeh D Stein; Paul G Barnett; Daniel W Sellen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Association of the type and time of insemination within the menstrual cycle with the human sex ratio at birth.

Authors:  R Guerrero
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring.

Authors:  R L Trivers; D E Willard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Socio-economic factors and the sex ratio at birth.

Authors:  M S Teitelbaum; N Mantel
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1971-01

6.  Differential mortality by sex in fetal and neonatal deaths.

Authors:  M M McMillen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Cycle day of insemination, coital rate, and sex ratio.

Authors:  W H James
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-01-16       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Maternal age, parity, social class and sex ratio.

Authors:  J Rostron; W H James
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Gender of infants conceived on different days of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  S Harlap
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  [Preconceptional selection of sex using the ionic method. Dietary regime. Results of a 2 years' prospective clinical study].

Authors:  F Papa; R Henrion; G Breart
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  1983
View more
  34 in total

1.  Does famine influence sex ratio at birth? Evidence from the 1959-1961 Great Leap Forward Famine in China.

Authors:  Shige Song
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cereal-induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive.

Authors:  S Stanley Young; Heejung Bang; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Can we understand modern humans without considering pathogens?

Authors:  Frédéric Thomas; Simon P Daoust; Michel Raymond
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Cognitive ability correlates positively with son birth and predicts cross-cultural variation of the offspring sex ratio.

Authors:  Madhukar Shivajirao Dama
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-05-09

5.  Adolescence: Does good nutrition = good behaviour?

Authors:  Bernard Gesch
Journal:  Nutr Health       Date:  2014-02-04

6.  Malnutrition, sex ratio, and selection: a study based on the great leap forward famine.

Authors:  Shige Song
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-12

7.  Contrasting effects of different maternal diets on sexually dimorphic gene expression in the murine placenta.

Authors:  Jiude Mao; Xia Zhang; Paizlee T Sieli; Michael T Falduto; Karen E Torres; Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sex differences in fetal growth responses to maternal height and weight.

Authors:  Michelle Lampl; Francesca Gotsch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Edward A Frongillo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.937

9.  Mother's occupation and sex ratio at birth.

Authors:  Kathreen E Ruckstuhl; Grant P Colijn; Volodymyr Amiot; Erin Vinish
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary humans: male-biased sex ratios among billionaires.

Authors:  Elissa Z Cameron; Fredrik Dalerum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.