Literature DB >> 18430153

Virtual community consultation? Using the literature and weblogs to link community perspectives and health technology assessment.

Jackie M Street1, Annette J Braunack-Mayer, Karen Facey, Richard E Ashcroft, Janet E Hiller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community views, expressed in social impact assessments and collected through community consultation, should play an important role in health technology assessment (HTA). Yet HTA methodologists have been slow to include outcomes of these forms of inquiry in analyses, in part because collecting community views is time-consuming and resource intensive.
OBJECTIVE: To explore how community views sourced from published studies, grey literature and informal internet web pages can inform HTA.
METHODS: A technology reviewed by Adelaide HTA in 2004 was selected: retinal photography for detection of diabetic retinopathy. Published literature, 'grey' literature and informal web pages were searched to examine the availability of evidence about service community and user community views with respect to this technology. Particular efforts were made to source evidence relating to rural, remote and Aboriginal populations.
RESULTS: We found that journal articles, reports from the grey literature and informal internet web pages (including blogs and discussion forums) can provide valuable insight into community views. Although there was little empirical evidence relating to the experience of diabetes and diabetes management in rural, remote and Aboriginal communities, there were indications that some evidence may be transferable from other populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Community perspectives on selected health technologies can be gauged from available resources in published and grey literature and perspectives collected in this way can provide insight into whether the introduction of the technology would be acceptable to the community. The limitations of this approach are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18430153      PMCID: PMC5060433          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00484.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  22 in total

1.  Ophthalmic knowledge and beliefs among women with diabetes.

Authors:  A Pasagian-Macaulay; C E Basch; P Zybert; J Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.140

2.  Perspectives on clinic attendance, medication and foot-care among people with diabetes in the Torres Strait Islands and Northern Peninsula Area.

Authors:  Morva Wong; Melissa Haswell-Elkins; Elizabeth Tamwoy; Robyn McDermott; Peter d'Abbs
Journal:  Aust J Rural Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.662

3.  Prevalence of trachoma and diabetes-related eye disease among a cohort of adult Aboriginal patients screened over the period 1999-2004 in remote South Australia.

Authors:  Shane R Durkin; Robert Casson; Henry S Newland; Dinesh Selva
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in an Aboriginal Australian population: results from the Katherine Region Diabetic Retinopathy Study (KRDRS). Report no. 1.

Authors:  Nandor Jaross; Philip Ryan; Henry Newland
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Comparison of patients' and healthcare professionals' beliefs about and attitudes towards Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M Clark; S E Hampson
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Questionnaire survey on periodic ocular examination in Japanese diabetic patients.

Authors:  Hideharu Funatsu; Sadao Hori; Erika Shimizu; Shinko Nakamura
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Diabetes care in remote northern Australian Indigenous communities.

Authors:  Robyn A McDermott; Fiona Tulip; Barbara Schmidt
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Socio-economic inequalities in diabetes complications, control, attitudes and health service use: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M O Bachmann; J Eachus; C D Hopper; G Davey Smith; C Propper; N J Pearson; S Williams; D Tallon; S Frankel
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.359

9.  Perceptions of diabetic retinopathy and screening procedures among diabetic people.

Authors:  M Trento; M Bajardi; E Borgo; P Passera; M Maurino; R Gibbins; D R Owens; F Cavallo; M Porta
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy using the mobile retinal camera: the Waikato experience.

Authors:  Elham Reda; Peter Dunn; Clive Straker; David Worsley; Keith Gross; Isla Trapski; Susan Whitcombe
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2003-08-22
View more
  9 in total

1.  Diagnosis blog: checking up on health blogs in the blogosphere.

Authors:  Edward Alan Miller; Antoinette Pole
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A pilot study to identify areas for further improvements in patient and public involvement in health technology assessments for medicines.

Authors:  Josie Messina; David L Grainger
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Involving patients in health technology funding decisions: stakeholder perspectives on processes used in Australia.

Authors:  Edilene Lopes; Jackie Street; Drew Carter; Tracy Merlin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Systematic review on the prevalence, frequency and comparative value of adverse events data in social media.

Authors:  Su Golder; Gill Norman; Yoon K Loke
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Sally Wortley; Allison Tong; Emily Lancsar; Glenn Salkeld; Kirsten Howard
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  FlexiTerm: a flexible term recognition method.

Authors:  Irena Spasić; Mark Greenwood; Alun Preece; Nick Francis; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2013-10-10

Review 7.  Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens' juries.

Authors:  Paul A Scuffham; Julie Ratcliffe; Elizabeth Kendall; Paul Burton; Andrew Wilson; Kalipso Chalkidou; Peter Littlejohns; Jennifer A Whitty
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Prioritising patients for bariatric surgery: building public preferences from a discrete choice experiment into public policy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Julie Ratcliffe; Elizabeth Kendall; Paul Burton; Andrew Wilson; Peter Littlejohns; Paul Harris; Rachael Krinks; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Use of Social Media in the Assessment of Relative Effectiveness: Explorative Review With Examples From Oncology.

Authors:  Rachel Rj Kalf; Amr Makady; Renske Mt Ten Ham; Kim Meijboom; Wim G Goettsch
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2018-06-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.