Literature DB >> 18427780

Variability in the concentrations of intravenous drug infusions prepared in a critical care unit.

Daniel Wren Wheeler1, Beverley Ann Degnan, Jobanpreet Singh Sehmi, Rowan Margaret Burnstein, David Krishna Menon, Arun Kumar Gupta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the variability in the concentration of drug infusions prepared on an intensive care unit and establish whether there was a relationship between the quality of syringe labeling and drug preparation.
DESIGN: Audit carried out over 3 weeks in May 2006 and completed in May 2007.
SETTING: The adult neurosciences critical care unit of a UK university teaching hospital.
INTERVENTIONS: Daily collections of discarded syringes containing midazolam, insulin, norepinephrine, dopamine, potassium or magnesium. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Residual solutions in the syringes were sampled and the concentrations measured. Syringe labels were inspected and awarded a score for labeling quality based on an 11-point scale. A total of 149 syringes were analyzed. Six of the magnesium syringes contained 4-5 times too much Mg(2+), presumably because of confusion about converting millimoles to grams. The majority of the other infusions differed from the expected concentration by more than 10%. Magnesium infusions were least likely to be properly labeled (p= 0.012), and there was a positive correlation between quality of syringe labeling and drug preparation (p=0.002). After the introduction of a new electrolyte prescription chart, magnesium and potassium preparation significantly improved but there was still substantial variability.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings present a strong argument for the use of pre-prepared syringes or standardized drug preparation and labeling systems. They also highlight once again the difficulties healthcare professionals encounter when dealing with different ways of expressing drug concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18427780     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1113-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  30 in total

1.  Reengineering intravenous drug and fluid administration processes in the operating room: step one: task analysis of existing processes.

Authors:  Deborah B Fraind; Jason M Slagle; Victor A Tubbesing; Samuel A Hughes; Matthew B Weinger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Factors influencing doctors' ability to calculate drug doses correctly.

Authors:  D W Wheeler; S J Wheeler; T R Ringrose
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Peter H Tonner; Norbert Weiler; Andrea Paris; Jens Scholz
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Safe use of lignocaine.

Authors:  J A Scrimshire
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-06-03

5.  Enzyme immunoassay for intact human insulin in serum or plasma.

Authors:  L Andersen; B Dinesen; P N Jørgensen; F Poulsen; M E Røder
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Reporting of medical errors: an intensive care unit experience.

Authors:  Stephen Osmon; Carolyn B Harris; W Claiborne Dunagan; Donna Prentice; Victoria J Fraser; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Difference between the measured and ordered dose of catecholamine infusions.

Authors:  E M Allen; D H Van Boerum; A F Olsen; J M Dean
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Discrepancies between ordered and delivered concentrations of opiate infusions in critical care.

Authors:  Christopher S Parshuram; Geraldine Y T Ng; Tommy K L Ho; Julia Klein; Aideen M Moore; Desmond Bohn; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Homogeneity of potassium chloride in small volume intravenous containers.

Authors:  D Drew; D Schumann
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Doctors' confusion over ratios and percentages in drug solutions: the case for standard labelling.

Authors:  Daniel Wren Wheeler; Dionysios Dennis Remoundos; Kim David Whittlestone; Michael Ian Palmer; Sarah Jane Wheeler; Timothy Richard Ringrose; David Krishna Menon
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  10 in total

1.  Iatrogenic magnesium toxicity following intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate: risks and strategies for prevention.

Authors:  Gillian F Cavell; Catherine Bryant; Seetal Jheeta
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-31

2.  Do centrally pre-prepared solutions achieve more reliable drug concentrations than solutions prepared on the ward?

Authors:  Carola Dehmel; Stephan A Braune; Georg Kreymann; Michael Baehr; Claudia Langebrake; Heike Hilgarth; Axel Nierhaus; Dorothee C Dartsch; Stefan Kluge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Rapid reconstitution packages (RRPs) for stable storage and delivery of glucagon.

Authors:  Sebastian D'hers; Agustín N Abad Vazquez; Pablo Gurman; Noel M Elman
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Rapid Reconstitution Packages (RRPs) implemented by integration of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 3D printed microfluidics.

Authors:  Albert Chi; Sebastian Curi; Kevin Clayton; David Luciano; Kameron Klauber; Alfredo Alexander-Katz; Sebastian D'hers; Noel M Elman
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Infusion medication concentrations in UK's critical care areas: Are the Intensive Care Society's recommendations being used?

Authors:  Yovita D Titiesari; Greg Barton; Mark Borthwick; Susan Keeling; Peter Keeling
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  Impact of simulation-based learning on medication error rates in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Daniel G Ford; Amy L Seybert; Pamela L Smithburger; Lawrence R Kobulinsky; Joseph T Samosky; Sandra L Kane-Gill
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Accuracy of intravenous and enteral preparations involving small volumes for paediatric use: a review.

Authors:  L P Ainscough; J L Ford; C W Morecroft; M Peak; M A Turner; A J Nunn; M Roberts
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-01-04

Review 8.  Systematic evidence review of rates and burden of harm of intravenous admixture drug preparation errors in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Nancy Hedlund; Idal Beer; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Patricia Trbovich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2008: III. Paediatrics, ethics, outcome research and critical care organization, sedation, pharmacology and miscellanea.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Robotic Therapy: Cost, Accuracy, and Times. New Challenges in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Ilaria Amodeo; Nicola Pesenti; Genny Raffaeli; Gabriele Sorrentino; Alessia Zorz; Silvia Traina; Silvia Magnani; Maria Teresa Russo; Salvatore Muscolo; Laura Plevani; Fabio Mosca; Giacomo Cavallaro
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.810

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.