Literature DB >> 12131115

Reengineering intravenous drug and fluid administration processes in the operating room: step one: task analysis of existing processes.

Deborah B Fraind1, Jason M Slagle, Victor A Tubbesing, Samuel A Hughes, Matthew B Weinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A reengineering approach to intravenous drug and fluid administration processes could improve anesthesia care. In this initial study, current intravenous administration tasks were examined to identify opportunities for improved design.
METHODS: After institutional review board approval was obtained, an observer sat in the operating room and categorized, in real time, anesthesia providers' activities during 35 cases ( approximately 90 h) into 66 task categories focused on drug/fluid tasks. Both initial room set-up at the beginning of a typical workday and cardiac and noncardiac general anesthesia cases were studied. User errors and inefficiencies were noted. The time required to prepare de novo a syringe containing a mock emergency drug was measured using a standard protocol.
RESULTS: Drug/fluid tasks consumed almost 50 and 75%, respectively, of the set-up time for noncardiac and cardiac cases. In 8 cardiac anesthetics, drug/fluid tasks comprised 27 +/- 6% (mean +/- SD) of all prebypass clinical activities. During 20 noncardiac cases, drug/fluid tasks comprised 20 +/- 8% of induction and 15 +/- 7% of maintenance. Drug preparation far outweighed drug administration tasks. Inefficient or error prone tasks were observed during drug/fluid preparation (e.g., supply acquisition, waste disposal, syringe labeling), administration (infusion device failure, leaking stopcock), and organization (workspace organization and navigation, untangling of intravenous lines). Anesthesia providers (n = 21) required 35 +/- 5 s to prepare a mock emergency drug.
CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous drug and fluid administration tasks account for a significant proportion of anesthesia care, especially in complex cases. Current processes are inefficient and may predispose to medical error. There appears to be substantial opportunity to improve quality and cost of care through the reengineering of anesthesia intravenous drug and fluid administration processes. General design requirements are proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131115     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

1.  The role of structured observational research in health care.

Authors:  J Carthey
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

2.  Systematic evaluation of errors occurring during the preparation of intravenous medication.

Authors:  Christopher S Parshuram; Teresa To; Winnie Seto; Angela Trope; Gideon Koren; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Do centrally pre-prepared solutions achieve more reliable drug concentrations than solutions prepared on the ward?

Authors:  Carola Dehmel; Stephan A Braune; Georg Kreymann; Michael Baehr; Claudia Langebrake; Heike Hilgarth; Axel Nierhaus; Dorothee C Dartsch; Stefan Kluge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Using an integrative mock-up simulation approach for evidence-based evaluation of operating room design prototypes.

Authors:  Sara Bayramzadeh; Anjali Joseph; David Allison; Jonas Shultz; James Abernathy
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Analysis of event logs from syringe pumps: a retrospective pilot study to assess possible effects of syringe pumps on safety in a university hospital critical care unit in Germany.

Authors:  Marc Kastrup; Felix Balzer; Thomas Volk; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Cost-Minimization Analysis of Dexmedetomidine Compared to Other Sedatives for Short-Term Sedation During Mechanical Ventilation in the United States.

Authors:  Jyoti Aggarwal; Jacqueline Lustrino; Jennifer Stephens; Diana Morgenstern; Wing Yu Tang
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2020-07-28

7.  Variability in the concentrations of intravenous drug infusions prepared in a critical care unit.

Authors:  Daniel Wren Wheeler; Beverley Ann Degnan; Jobanpreet Singh Sehmi; Rowan Margaret Burnstein; David Krishna Menon; Arun Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The composition of intern work while on call.

Authors:  Kathlyn E Fletcher; Alexis M Visotcky; Jason M Slagle; Sergey Tarima; Matthew B Weinger; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Video capture of clinical care to enhance patient safety.

Authors:  M B Weinger; D C Gonzales; J Slagle; M Syeed
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

10.  Facilitated Nurse Medication-Related Event Reporting to Improve Medication Management Quality and Safety in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Carrie Reale; Jason M Slagle; Shilo Anders; Matthew S Shotwell; Timothy Dresselhaus; Matthew B Weinger
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.