Literature DB >> 18427318

Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases.

Thomas Hoogland1, Karolien van den Brekel-Dijkstra, Michael Schubert, Boris Miklitz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive patients who underwent transforaminal endoscopic excision for recurrent lumbar disc herniation, after previous discectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To review complications and results of the endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (ETD) for recurrent herniated disc with a 2-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recurrent herniation is a significant problem, as scar formation and progressive disc degeneration may lead to increased morbidity after traditional posterior reoperation. The studies published until now on recurrent disc herniation concern various operative techniques, mostly the lumbar microdiscectomy, which is still seen as the standard. The advantage of ETD could be that there is no need to go through the old scar tissue and the procedure can be performed in local anesthesia. The disadvantage may be a long learning curve for the surgeon.
METHOD: Between January 1994 and November 2002, 262 patients with primarily radicular problems underwent an ETD for a recurrent herniated disc. Two hundred and thirty-eight of these patients (90.84%) completed our 2-year follow-up questionnaire. Initial surgery of 82 patients was performed in-house, 180 external. Average age was 46.4 years. The female/male ratio was 29/71%.
RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up 85.71% of patients rated the result of the surgery as excellent or good. 9.66% reported a fair and 4.62% patients an unsatisfactory result. Average improvement of back pain of 5.71 points and 5.85 points of leg pain on the VAS scale (1-10). According to Mac Nab, 30.67% of the patients felt fully regenerated, 50% felt their functional capacity to be slightly restricted, 16.81% felt their functional capacity noticeably restricted, and 2.52% felt unimproved or worse. All patients participated in a 3-month follow-up to establish the perioperative complications. The overall complication rate was 10/262 (3.8%), including 3 nerve root irritations and 7 early recurrent herniations (<3 month). There was no case of infection or discitis. After 3 months and within 2 years, 4 patients have been treated for a recurrent herniated disc in our own center and 7 patients have been treated elsewhere, resulting in a recurrence rate 11/238 (4.62%).
CONCLUSION: ETD for recurrent disc herniation seems to be an effective method with few complications and a high patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18427318     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8ade

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  60 in total

1.  Letter to the editor concerning "transforaminal endoscopic surgery for lumbar stenosis: a systematic review" (Nellensteijn et al.).

Authors:  Carl Hans Fürstenberg; Ralf Wagner; Michael Schubert; Florian Maria Alfen; Guntram Krzok; Alastair Gibson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Bronius Spakauskas; Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Development of preoperative planning software for transforaminal endoscopic surgery and the guidance for clinical applications.

Authors:  Xiaojun Chen; Jun Cheng; Xin Gu; Yi Sun; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Symptomatic post-discectomy pseudocyst after endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Suk Hyung Kang; Seung Won Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-01-31

5.  Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation.

Authors:  Dong Yeob Lee; Chan Shik Shim; Yong Ahn; Young-Geun Choi; Ho Jin Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-12-31

6.  Full Endoscopic Spinal Surgery Techniques: Advancements, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  James J Yue; William Long
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-20

7.  A randomised controlled trial of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs microdiscectomy.

Authors:  J N Alaistair Gibson; Ashok S Subramanian; Chloe E H Scott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Combined With an Interspinous Process Distraction System for Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Carolina Ramírez Martínez; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz; Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

9.  A Mobile Outside-in Technique of Transforaminal Lumbar Endoscopy for Lumbar Disc Herniations.

Authors:  Hyeun Sung Kim; Nitin Adsul; Ankur Kapoor; Sung Ho Choi; Jeong Hoon Kim; Ki Joon Kim; Jeong Soo Bang; Kyun Hoong Yang; Seok Han; Jae Hyun Lim; Jee-Soo Jang; Ii-Tae Jang; Seong-Hoon Oh
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jorm Nellensteijn; Raymond Ostelo; Ronald Bartels; Wilco Peul; Barend van Royen; Maurits van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.