Literature DB >> 18426969

Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system.

Jin-Young Choi1, Myeong-Jin Kim, Yong Eun Chung, Ji Youn Kim, Alun C Jones, Jan de Becker, Marc van Cauteren.   

Abstract

With the development of dedicated receiver coils and increased gradient performance, 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) systems are gaining wider acceptance in clinical practice. The expected twofold increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared with that of 1.5-T MR systems may help improve spatial resolution or increase temporal resolution when used with parallel acquisition techniques. Several issues must be considered when applying 3.0-T MR in the abdomen, including the alteration of the radiofrequency field and relaxation time, increase in energy deposition and susceptibility effects, and problems associated with motion artifacts. For the evaluation of liver lesions, higher SNR and greater resolution achieved with the 3.0-T system could translate into better detection of malignant lesions on T2-weighted images obtained with adjusted imaging parameters. For the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary diseases, high-resolution T2-weighted imaging using single-shot turbo spin-echo sequences is useful; improvement in SNR was noticeable on two-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatographic images. For the preoperative imaging of rectal cancer, a single-shot sequence is useful for dramatically decreasing imaging time while maintaining image quality. Substantial modification of examination protocols, with optimized imaging parameters and sequence designs along with ongoing development of hardware, could contribute to an increased role of the 3.0-T system for abdominal MR examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426969     DOI: 10.1148/rg.e30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  9 in total

1.  Multiparametric 3T endorectal mri after external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Galen D Reed; Phillip P Vinh; Christopher Sotto; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Isotropic 3-D T2-weighted spin-echo for abdominal and pelvic MRI in children.

Authors:  Sílvia Costa Dias; Oystein E Ølsen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28

3.  1H-MR spectroscopy of suspicious breast mass lesions at 3T: a clinical experience.

Authors:  Stefania Montemezzi; Carlo Cavedon; Lucia Camera; Gabriele Meliadò; Francesca Caumo; Ilaria Baglio; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3.0 T MR imaging: quantitative and qualitative comparison of hepatocyte-phase images obtained 10 min and 20 min after injection for the detection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Keitaro Sofue; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Hiroyuki Tokue; Yasuaki Arai; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Detection of hepatic metastases by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: prospective comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T images in the same patients.

Authors:  Keitaro Sofue; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Mototaka Miyake; Aine Sakurada; Yasuaki Arai; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  3 Tesla MR neurography--technique, interpretation, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Avneesh Chhabra; Pearlene P Lee; Cary Bizzell; Theodoros Soldatos
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Current Landscape and Future Perspectives of Abbreviated MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Park; Nieun Seo; So Yeon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.109

8.  Magnetic Resonance of Rectal Cancer Response to Therapy: An Image Quality Comparison between 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Damiano Caruso; Marta Zerunian; Domenico De Santis; Tommaso Biondi; Pasquale Paolantonio; Marco Rengo; Davide Bellini; Riccardo Ferrari; Maria Ciolina; Elena Lucertini; Michela Polici; Elsa Iannicelli; Vincenzo Tombolini; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Can diffusion weighted imaging be used as an alternative to contrast-enhanced imaging on magnetic resonance enterography for the assessment of active inflammation in Crohn disease?

Authors:  Aysegul Cansu; Suleyman Bekircavusoglu; Sukru Oguz; Eser Bulut; Sami Fidan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.