Literature DB >> 18426292

The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses.

Jeffrey W Sherman1, Bertram Gawronski, Karen Gonsalkorale, Kurt Hugenberg, Thomas J Allen, Carla J Groom.   

Abstract

The distinction between automatic processes and controlled processes is a central organizational theme across areas of psychology. However, this dichotomy conceals important differences among qualitatively different processes that independently contribute to ongoing behavior. The Quadruple process model is a multinomial model that provides quantitative estimates of 4 distinct processes in a single task: the likelihood that an automatic response tendency is activated; the likelihood that a contextually appropriate response can be determined; the likelihood that automatic response tendencies are overcome when necessary; and the likelihood that in the absence of other information, behavior is driven by a general response bias. The model integrates dual-process models from many domains of inquiry and offers a generalized, more nuanced framework of impulse regulation across these domains. The model offers insights into many central questions surrounding the operation and the interaction of automatic and controlled processes. Applications of the model to empirical and theoretical concerns in a variety of areas of psychology are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426292     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  30 in total

1.  Response Conflict and Affective Responses in the Control and Expression of Race Bias.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Erika A Henry
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2010-10

2.  Applying the Quadruple Process model to evaluate change in implicit attitudinal responses during therapy for panic disorder.

Authors:  Elise M Clerkin; Christopher R Fisher; Jeffrey W Sherman; Bethany A Teachman
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2013-11-10

3. 

Authors:  Steven J Sherman; Laurie Chassin; Jeffrey W Sherman; Clark C Presson; Jonathan T Macy
Journal:  Psicol Soc (Bologna)       Date:  2012

Review 4.  When more data steer us wrong: replications with the wrong dependent measure perpetuate erroneous conclusions.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Evan Heit; Chad Dubé
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

5.  Growth trajectories of alcohol information processing and associations with escalation of drinking in early adolescence.

Authors:  Craig R Colder; Roisin M O'Connor; Jennifer P Read; Rina D Eiden; Liliana J Lengua; Larry W Hawk; William F Wieczorek
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-05-19

6.  The system neurophysiological basis of non-adaptive cognitive control: Inhibition of implicit learning mediated by right prefrontal regions.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Laura Steenbergen; Lorenza Colzato; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Explicit- and implicit bullying attitudes in relation to bullying behavior.

Authors:  Anne A J van Goethem; Ron H J Scholte; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2010-08

8.  Implicit cognition and substance use: the role of controlled and automatic processes in children.

Authors:  Roisin M O'Connor; Hector I Lopez-Vergara; Craig R Colder
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Characterizing switching and congruency effects in the Implicit Association Test as reactive and proactive cognitive control.

Authors:  Joseph Hilgard; Bruce D Bartholow; Cheryl L Dickter; Hart Blanton
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Intoxicated prejudice: The impact of alcohol consumption on implicitly and explicitly measured racial attitudes.

Authors:  Chris Loersch; Bruce D Bartholow; Mark Manning; Jimmy Calanchini; Jeffrey W Sherman
Journal:  Group Process Intergroup Relat       Date:  2015-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.