Literature DB >> 27477001

The system neurophysiological basis of non-adaptive cognitive control: Inhibition of implicit learning mediated by right prefrontal regions.

Ann-Kathrin Stock1, Laura Steenbergen2, Lorenza Colzato2, Christian Beste1,3.   

Abstract

Cognitive control is adaptive in the sense that it inhibits automatic processes to optimize goal-directed behavior, but high levels of control may also have detrimental effects in case they suppress beneficial automatisms. Until now, the system neurophysiological mechanisms and functional neuroanatomy underlying these adverse effects of cognitive control have remained elusive. This question was examined by analyzing the automatic exploitation of a beneficial implicit predictive feature under conditions of high versus low cognitive control demands, combining event-related potentials (ERPs) and source localization. It was found that cognitive control prohibits the beneficial automatic exploitation of additional implicit information when task demands are high. Bottom-up perceptual and attentional selection processes (P1 and N1 ERPs) are not modulated by this, but the automatic exploitation of beneficial predictive information in case of low cognitive control demands was associated with larger response-locked P3 amplitudes and stronger activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG, BA47). This suggests that the rIFG plays a key role in the detection of relevant task cues, the exploitation of alternative task sets, and the automatic (bottom-up) implementation and reprogramming of action plans. Moreover, N450 amplitudes were larger under high cognitive control demands, which was associated with activity differences in the right medial frontal gyrus (BA9). This most likely reflects a stronger exploitation of explicit task sets which hinders the exploration of the implicit beneficial information in case of high cognitive control demands. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4511-4522, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; automatic processing; cognitive control; rIFG; source localization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27477001      PMCID: PMC6867272          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  63 in total

1.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

Authors:  M M Botvinick; T S Braver; D M Barch; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

Review 3.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The system neurophysiological basis of backward inhibition.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Rico Fischer; Christian Beste
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction.

Authors:  Kensuke Sekihara; Maneesh Sahani; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  The spline-Laplacian in clinical neurophysiology: a method to improve EEG spatial resolution.

Authors:  P L Nunez; K L Pilgreen
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 7.  Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs.

Authors:  Michael J Larson; Peter E Clayson; Ann Clawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 8.  Executive functions.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 9.  Generator localization by current source density (CSD): implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Cognitive and electrophysiological correlates of the bilingual stroop effect.

Authors:  Lavelda J Naylor; Emily M Stanley; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Dorsal striatum mediates deliberate decision making, not late-stage, stimulus-response learning.

Authors:  Nole M Hiebert; Adrian M Owen; Ken N Seergobin; Penny A MacDonald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Conflict processing in juvenile patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and healthy controls - Two pathways to success.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Maja von der Hagen; Katharina Papenhagen; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.881

3.  The Intensity of Early Attentional Processing, but Not Conflict Monitoring, Determines the Size of Subliminal Response Conflicts.

Authors:  Wiebke Bensmann; Amirali Vahid; Christian Beste; Ann-Kathrin Stock
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Tracking the implicit acquisition of nonadjacent transitional probabilities by ERPs.

Authors:  Andrea Kóbor; Kata Horváth; Zsófia Kardos; Ádám Takács; Karolina Janacsek; Valéria Csépe; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

5.  The Role of DRD1 and DRD2 Receptors for Response Selection Under Varying Complexity Levels: Implications for Metacontrol Processes.

Authors:  Nicolas Zink; Wiebke Bensmann; Larissa Arning; Lorenza S Colzato; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 5.176

6.  Action Modulates the Conscious Reasoning Process of Moral Judgment: Evidence From Behavior and Neurophysiology.

Authors:  Yue Leng; Jili Zhang; Yanan Zhangyu; Xiaoyuan Yang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  On the Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying the Adaptability to Varying Cognitive Control Demands.

Authors:  Nicolas Zink; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Amirali Vahid; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.