Literature DB >> 18425668

Epinephrine and cortisol responses to work: a test of the models of Frankenhaeuser and Karasek.

T M Pollard1, G Ungpakorn, G A Harrison, K R Parkes.   

Abstract

Both Frankenhaeuser and Karasek have put forward models describing how job demand and control influence epinephrine and cortisol levels. These models were tested in a sample of 53 women and 51 men in a variety of occupations. They were studied over one rest day and two working days. Subjects reported their perceived demand and control and their mood on each day, as well as providing urine for assessment of urinary excretion rates of epinephrine and cortisol. In men, but not women, epinephrine levels were higher on the working days than on the rest day, and demand was found to covary positively with epinephrine, supporting Frankenhaeuser's model with respect to epinephrine variation in men. However, cortisol levels were not elevated on working days compared to the rest day, and no relationship between job control and cortisol was seen which is in contradiction of Frankenhaeuser's model with respect to cortisol variation. There was some suggestion that demand was most strongly associated with elevated epinephrine in men when job control was low in accordance with Karasek's model, but there was no evidence for such an effect with respect to cortisol.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 18425668     DOI: 10.1007/BF02895284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  37 in total

1.  Premenopausal and postmenopausal women differ in their cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses to behavioral stressors.

Authors:  P G Saab; K A Matthews; C M Stoney; R H McDonald
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Gender, stress, and health.

Authors:  A Baum; N E Grunberg
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Mental and physical components of sawmill operatives' workload.

Authors:  W Fibiger; F Christensen; G Singer; H Kaufmann
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Measurement of stress and arousal: validation of the stress/arousal adjective checklist.

Authors:  M G King; G D Burrows; G V Stanley
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1983-11

5.  Social psychological and neuroendocrine stress reactions in highly mechanised work.

Authors:  G Johansson; G Aronsson; B O Lindström
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Pituitary-adrenal and sympathetic-adrenal correlates of distress and effort.

Authors:  U Lundberg; M Frankenhaeuser
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Catecholamine excretion rates and occupation.

Authors:  D A Jenner; V Reynolds; G A Harrison
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Effects of simulated repetitive work on urinary catecholamine excretion.

Authors:  S Cox; T Cox; M Thirlaway; C Mackay
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men.

Authors:  R Karasek; D Baker; F Marxer; A Ahlbom; T Theorell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  A stress and arousal mood scale for low vocabulary subjects: a reworking of Mackay et al. (1978).

Authors:  P J Cruickshank
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1984-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential circadian catecholamine and cortisol responses between healthy women with and without a parental history of hypertension.

Authors:  Gary D James; Alexandria S Alfarano; Helene M van Berge-Landry
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 1.937

2.  Physical activity, job demand-control, perceived stress-energy, and salivary cortisol in white-collar workers.

Authors:  Ase Marie Hansen; Anne Katrine Blangsted; Ernst Albin Hansen; Karen Søgaard; Gisela Sjøgaard
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Day-to-day differences in cortisol levels and molar cortisol-to-DHEA ratios among working individuals.

Authors:  Min-Soo Kim; Young-Jin Lee; Ryun-Sup Ahn
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  The effects of age and ethnicity on the circadian variation of catecholamines and cortisol in employed women.

Authors:  Gary D James
Journal:  Womens Midlife Health       Date:  2018-06-28

5.  Physiological reactions to acute stressors and subjective stress during daily life: A systematic review on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies.

Authors:  Jeannette Weber; Peter Angerer; Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.