Martin Steinau1, David C Swan, Elizabeth R Unger. 1. Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vector-borne and Enteric Diseases, Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Msteinau@cdc.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type-specific detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) is increasingly important for monitoring temporal and age-specific changes in type-specific prevalence in support of HPV vaccination efforts. The impact of sampling, extraction and assay characteristics on HPV results is increasingly recognized. Inter-assay comparability studies have been performed, but the robustness of type-specific results has neither been emphasized nor has the degree of intra-assay reproducibility been addressed. OBJECTIVES: Here we describe the general and type-specific reproducibility of the linear array HPV genotyping test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). STUDY DESIGN: Extracts of 276 cervical samples from two ongoing epidemiologic HPV studies were retested while blinded to prior results. The testing involved five different reagent lots and three technologists. RESULTS: Concordance for HPV detection (sample positive versus negative for any of the 37 types) was high (98.2%, kappa=0.959). Type-specific concordance for individual HPV types was also high (99.4%, kappa=0.915), and most samples (83.0%) showed complete concordance for all types. CONCLUSIONS: Type-specific reproducibility of the linear array HPV genotyping test is good but not perfect. The results suggest that type-specific performance should be included in the evaluation of HPV typing formats.
BACKGROUND: Type-specific detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) is increasingly important for monitoring temporal and age-specific changes in type-specific prevalence in support of HPV vaccination efforts. The impact of sampling, extraction and assay characteristics on HPV results is increasingly recognized. Inter-assay comparability studies have been performed, but the robustness of type-specific results has neither been emphasized nor has the degree of intra-assay reproducibility been addressed. OBJECTIVES: Here we describe the general and type-specific reproducibility of the linear array HPV genotyping test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). STUDY DESIGN: Extracts of 276 cervical samples from two ongoing epidemiologic HPV studies were retested while blinded to prior results. The testing involved five different reagent lots and three technologists. RESULTS: Concordance for HPV detection (sample positive versus negative for any of the 37 types) was high (98.2%, kappa=0.959). Type-specific concordance for individual HPV types was also high (99.4%, kappa=0.915), and most samples (83.0%) showed complete concordance for all types. CONCLUSIONS: Type-specific reproducibility of the linear array HPV genotyping test is good but not perfect. The results suggest that type-specific performance should be included in the evaluation of HPV typing formats.
Authors: Jessica A Kahn; Darron R Brown; Lili Ding; Lea E Widdice; Marcia L Shew; Susan Glynn; David I Bernstein Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sepehr N Tabrizi; Matthew P Stevens; Marina T van Leeuwen; Claire M Vajdic; Leon P Botes; Gabriele Medley; Richard Hillman; Andrew Grulich; Suzanne M Garland Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Jill Koshiol; S Terence Dunn; Joan L Walker; Rosemary E Zuna; Mark Schiffman; Mark E Sherman; Michael A Gold; Richard A Allen; Roy Zhang; Sophia S Wang; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Grace C Blitzer; Molly A Smith; Stephen L Harris; Randall J Kimple Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Oscar Gee-Wan Wong; C K Lo; Joanne N K Chow; Obe K L Tsun; Elaine Szeto; Stephanie S Liu; Hextan Y S Ngan; Annie N Y Cheung Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Yi-Wei Tang; Lorena Lozano; Xin Chen; Troy D Querec; Nora Katabi; Antonio Moreno-Docón; Hongmei Wang; Daniel Fix; Louise De Brot; Tracy A McMillen; Ju-Yoon Yoon; Amparo Torroba; Youxiang Wang; Elizabeth R Unger; Kay J Park Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 5.568