Literature DB >> 18424147

Cooperative sentinel calling? Foragers gain increased biomass intake.

Linda I Hollén1, Matthew B V Bell, Andrew N Radford.   

Abstract

Many foraging animals face a fundamental tradeoff between predation and starvation. In a range of social species, this tradeoff has probably driven the evolution of sentinel behavior, where individuals adopt prominent positions to watch for predators while groupmates forage. Although there has been much debate about whether acting as a sentinel is a selfish or cooperative behavior, far less attention has focused on why sentinels often produce quiet vocalizations (hereafter known as "sentinel calls") to announce their presence. We use observational and experimental data to provide the first evidence that group members gain an increase in foraging success by responding to these vocal cues given by sentinels. Foraging pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) spread out more, use more exposed patches, look up less often, and spend less time vigilant in response to sentinel calling. Crucially, we demonstrate that these behavioral alterations lead to an increase in biomass intake by foragers, which is likely to enhance survival. We argue that this benefit may be the reason for sentinel calling, making it a truly cooperative behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424147     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  19 in total

1.  Negotiating a stable solution for vigilance behaviour.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Tim W Fawcett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Bargaining babblers: vocal negotiation of cooperative behaviour in a social bird.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R A Smith; A M Thompson; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R Rose; H M Wade; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The higher the better: sentinel height influences foraging success in a social bird.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Linda I Hollén; Matthew B V Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Bright birds are cautious: seasonally conspicuous plumage prompts risk avoidance by male superb fairy-wrens.

Authors:  Alexandra McQueen; Annalise C Naimo; Niki Teunissen; Robert D Magrath; Kaspar Delhey; Anne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler.

Authors:  Sabrina Engesser; Amanda R Ridley; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Interspecific signalling between mutualists: food-thieving drongos use a cooperative sentinel call to manipulate foraging partners.

Authors:  Bruce D Baigrie; Alex M Thompson; Tom P Flower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Group size adjustment to ecological demand in a cooperative breeder.

Authors:  Markus Zöttl; Joachim G Frommen; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Calling by concluding sentinels: coordinating cooperation or revealing risk?

Authors:  Linda I Hollén; Matthew B V Bell; Alexis Russell; Fraser Niven; Amanda R Ridley; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Looking after your partner: sentinel behaviour in a socially monogamous bird.

Authors:  Mark C Mainwaring; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.