AIM/ PURPOSE: (123)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-mIBG) scintigraphy is well established for staging and evaluation of response in children with high-risk neuroblastoma but its prognostic value in highly intensive first-line treatment protocols is uncertain. The presence of any (123)I-mIBG positive tumour tissue was correlated with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prognostic impact of residual (123)I-mIBG uptake into the primary tumour and metastases for predicting outcome in 113 stage 4 neuroblastoma patients >1 year of the German Neuroblastoma Trial NB97 was assessed using a univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS:All patients had (123)I-mIBG positive disease at initial staging. After four courses of induction chemotherapy, 71% of patients were still (123)I-mIBG positive for the primary tumour and 61% for metastases. After six courses, 39% of patients had (123)I-mIBG uptake by the primary tumour and 45% residual (123)I-mIBG positive metastatic disease. The (123)I-mIBG status of the primary tumour site had no bearing on outcome. Residual (123)I-mIBG positive metastatic disease after four (3-y-EFS 25.7+/-5.3% versus 55.9+/-7.6%, p=0.009; 3-y-OS 49.8+/-6.1% versus 65.0+/-7.3%; p=0.021) and after six chemotherapy cycles (3-y-EFS 27.5+/-6.2% versus 47.4+/-6.4%, p=0.011; 3-y-OS 50.5+/-7.1% vs 60.0+/-6.4%, p=0.031) was associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSION:Functional imaging with (123)I-mIBG scintigraphy can identify poor responders with any persistent metastatic (123)I-mIBG uptake who are at a high risk of disease relapse. (123)I-mIBG response of the primary tumour site had no bearing on outcome.
RCT Entities:
AIM/ PURPOSE: (123)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-mIBG) scintigraphy is well established for staging and evaluation of response in children with high-risk neuroblastoma but its prognostic value in highly intensive first-line treatment protocols is uncertain. The presence of any (123)I-mIBG positive tumour tissue was correlated with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prognostic impact of residual (123)I-mIBG uptake into the primary tumour and metastases for predicting outcome in 113 stage 4 neuroblastomapatients >1 year of the German Neuroblastoma Trial NB97 was assessed using a univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: All patients had (123)I-mIBG positive disease at initial staging. After four courses of induction chemotherapy, 71% of patients were still (123)I-mIBG positive for the primary tumour and 61% for metastases. After six courses, 39% of patients had (123)I-mIBG uptake by the primary tumour and 45% residual (123)I-mIBG positive metastatic disease. The (123)I-mIBG status of the primary tumour site had no bearing on outcome. Residual (123)I-mIBG positive metastatic disease after four (3-y-EFS 25.7+/-5.3% versus 55.9+/-7.6%, p=0.009; 3-y-OS 49.8+/-6.1% versus 65.0+/-7.3%; p=0.021) and after six chemotherapy cycles (3-y-EFS 27.5+/-6.2% versus 47.4+/-6.4%, p=0.011; 3-y-OS 50.5+/-7.1% vs 60.0+/-6.4%, p=0.031) was associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Functional imaging with (123)I-mIBG scintigraphy can identify poor responders with any persistent metastatic (123)I-mIBG uptake who are at a high risk of disease relapse. (123)I-mIBG response of the primary tumour site had no bearing on outcome.
Authors: Zvi Bar-Sever; Lorenzo Biassoni; Barry Shulkin; Grace Kong; Michael S Hofman; Egesta Lopci; Irina Manea; Jacek Koziorowski; Rita Castellani; Ariane Boubaker; Bieke Lambert; Thomas Pfluger; Helen Nadel; Susan Sharp; Francesco Giammarile Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Henriette Ingrid Melzer; Eva Coppenrath; Irene Schmid; Michael H Albert; Dietrich von Schweinitz; Coral Tudball; Peter Bartenstein; Thomas Pfluger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: K K Matthay; B Shulkin; R Ladenstein; J Michon; F Giammarile; V Lewington; A D J Pearson; S L Cohn Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-04-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Gregory A Yanik; Marguerite T Parisi; Barry L Shulkin; Arlene Naranjo; Susan G Kreissman; Wendy B London; Judith G Villablanca; John M Maris; Julie R Park; Susan L Cohn; Patrick McGrady; Katherine K Matthay Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 10.057